|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, October 11, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
Ensure inflow, Karnataka told
By J. Venkatesan
NEW DELHI, OCT. 10. Within hours of the Tamil Nadu Chief
Minister, Mr. O. Paneerselvam, expressing ``disappointment'' over
the outcome of the talks, the Cauvery River Authority (CRA)
headed by the Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, today
directed the Karnataka Government to ``ensure inflows at the
Mettur reservoir as stipulated by the Tribunal, especially in
view of the situation being faced in the Cauvery basin''.
Soon after the meeting, both Mr. Paneerselvam and the State Law
Minister, Mr. C. Ponnaiyan, described the Authority as
``toothless and powerless'' and accused Mr. Vajpayee of not
giving any direction to Karnataka to save the withering `kuruvai'
crops in Tamil Nadu. They said that even after the Water
Resources Secretary pointed out that Karnataka could spare at
least 10 tmcft (thousand million cubic feet) of water to Tamil
Nadu, the Prime Minister did not respond positively as Karnataka
strongly opposed Tamil Nadu's demand.
The Karnataka Chief Minister, Mr. S.M. Krishna, told reporters
that the Authority had not given any direction to the State,
though he described the talks as ``useful''.
Apparently, the Authority had taken the decision to give a
direction to Karnataka taking into consideration Tamil Nadu's
demands, which complained that Karnataka had been flouting the
orders of the Tribunal continuously.
In a press release, the Centre said ``the Authority also decided
that the storage position in Karnataka and Tamil Nadu will now be
reviewed by the Cauvery Monitoring Committee on a monthly basis,
and if the situation warrants, will recommend for convening an
emergency meeting''.
The Authority observed that the current year was one of the most
difficult years for the Cauvery basin as was evident from the
fact that inflows into the Mettur reservoir were only 55 per cent
of the normal inflows and the total storage in four Karnataka
reservoirs was also only 77 per cent of the design storage.
For a distress situation like in the current year in the Cauvery
basin, the Tribunal, in its clarificatory order of April 1992,
had directed for pro-rata sharing of the distress, the Authority
decided to work out an acceptable and equitable procedure for
pro-rata sharing of the distress and, accordingly, requested the
basin States to put forward their specific suggestions for
consideration.
Earlier, Mr. Paneerselvam, who was upset over the failure of the
talks, had told reporters that the no decision could be arrived
at as the Karnataka Chief Minister had taken a rigid stand.
Mr. Paneerselvam said the decision of the Authority was to leave
the farmers of Tamil Nadu to the fate of rain God. He said ``the
Prime Minister has let us down. Neither Karnataka has listened to
Tamil Nadu's plea nor the Authority is helpful in solving the
problem.''
However, Mr. Krishna disputed Tamil Nadu's contention and said
Karnataka had released 27 tmcft of water to Tamil Nadu between
September 11 and October 7, which was almost equivalent to Tamil
Nadu's demand of one tmcft of water per day.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : JeM under 'close' U.S. watch Next : Dissolved | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|