|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, January 28, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
The battle begins at home
Under the Bush administration, there is going to be a premium on
domestic policies, but not necessarily at the expense of foreign
policy, says SRIDHAR KRISHNASWAMI.
THE RITUALS and the hoopla out of the way; the 43rd President of
the United States, Mr. George W. Bush, is settling down at 1600
Pennsylvania Avenue and trying to find out what Washington D.C.
is all about. For one who has expressed disdain for all that the
city stands for - politically that is - the Republican will soon
find out that it is not about to change its old ways, even if the
first impression from Capitol Hill is one of bipartisan warmth
and friendship.
There is a very long way to go for the new President; and Mr.
Bush is not even pretending now that he has mastered, or will be
able to get by in, the ways of the capital city in the next four
years. And for a Republican President coming to office after a
gap of eight years, he knows full well that the realm of domestic
politics cuts at least two ways - ideology and policies, not
necessarily going hand-in-hand.
The bottomline for the next four years is that there is going to
be a premium on domestic politics and policies, but not
necessarily at the expense of foreign policy. The divisive
election was fought on domestic issues and on the differences
between Mr. Bush and Mr. Al Gore on things that are quite dear to
the American people. And in the election of 2004, the incumbent -
assuming that he is in the fray - will be judged for the most
part on the goods delivered on the home front.
Mr. Bush appears to have started off in the right direction with
something that he has always been known for in Texas - reaching
out to the ``other side''. Mr. Bush knows only too well that if
he is going to push his Conservative economic and political
agenda, he will have to find grounds of accommodation with left-
of-centre Democrats many of whom are still miffed that the White
House went to the Republicans as a result of a technical decision
by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The success of Mr. Bush over the next four years will depend on
how much of the positive and the practical of Mr. Ronald Reagan
and Mr. Bill Clinton he is willing to emulate. One of the
strengths of the Reagan Presidency was his ability to bring
Democrats on board right from the start of his tenure in 1981;
and Mr. Clinton's best part was in taking on the Republicans in
their own backyard and in many times frustrating the Grand Old
Party by taking up its own agenda.
Mr. Bush's conservative agenda goes much further than the $ 1.6
trillion ten-year tax cut proposal. It includes such issues as
education, social security, medicare and prescription drugs, to
mention a few. And then with Republicans such as the Senator, Mr.
John McCain, constantly breathing down his neck, the issue of
campaign finance reform is also significant.
It is not without good reason that Mr. Bush has chosen to focus
on education and tax cuts as his first major tests in Washington
D.C. and on Capitol Hill. Education has always been at the heart
of the Bush campaign even if his track record in Texas has been
derided by the Democrats; and the issue strikes at the heart of
the conservatives' philosophy of getting a critical component of
the family and the system back firmly in the hands of local
authorities.
``No Child Left Behind'' - that is the essence of Mr. Bush's
education plan. The main principle being that the federal role in
education is not to serve the system, but the children. Through a
mixture of rewards and punishments, the proposal calls for more
accountability with a focus on achieving what will work,
including teacher improvement and reducing the involvement of the
federal bureaucracy.
The $ 47-billion plan had its first teething troubles when
Democrats lashed out at the idea of issuing `vouchers' or funds
to parents to move their kids out of non-performing public
schools into private schools. Democrats argue that there is not
only an element of elitism in this concept but that it will cause
real trouble to the public school system in the United States.
After initially hanging tough on `vouchers', the Bush
administration has given signs that it is willing to back off a
little.
And as far as tax cuts are concerned, that was only to be
expected. With all the noise being made about the economy getting
into recession mode, the Republicans are hopeful that the
Democrats will also sign on to a proposal that has again been
criticised as being too favourable to the rich. Democrats argue
that for any tax cut plan to be even considered the national debt
must be paid down; making sure there is money for prescription
drugs, education and expanding health care.
Democrats such as Mr. Richard Gephardt, Minority Leader in the
House of Representatives, have argued that the first step of the
new administration would be to reach an overall accord with
Congress on the Budget with a view to seeing where the room is
for tax cuts.
Mr. Bush has a two-fold challenge in coming to terms with his
agenda - he must reach out to both the political Left and the
Right; and in many ways dealing with the Democrats is not going
to be as big as dealing with his own folks sitting on the extreme
fringes. For now, the temptation has been to look at lawmakers
such as Mr. Zell Miller, Senator from Georgia, and claim that
Democrats have come on board. But there is a long way to go for
the week-old Presidency.
And there is yet another challenge for Mr. Bush, over the next
four years. After eight successful years, Mr. Clinton may no
longer be occupying the White House, but he is very much around.
Ex-Presidents are supposed to turn into the ``Wise Old''
category, fade away and show up only on specified occasions. But
not Mr. Clinton.
At 54, he is a few weeks younger than Mr. Bush, politically as
smart as he was and the Democratic Party will still lean on him,
not just for valuable campaign advice but for all that money he
rakes in. The ``bad'' news for Mr. Bush is not just the Clintons
- Ms. Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Senator now - in Washington
D.C. or New York, but also that his November tormentor, the
former Vice-President, Mr. Gore, is just a few miles away in
Virginia.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Will he slip the noose? Next : Acrimony still | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|