The Hindu : Sport / Cricket : Sreesanth must be banned for beamer, says Atherton

Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Monday, Aug 06, 2007
ePaper

Sport

Sport - Cricket

Sreesanth must be banned for beamer, says Atherton

London: Former England captain Mike Atherton has called for Sreesanth to be “banned” for the third cricket Test, saying the Indian seamer’s bowling in the second match was “completely counter to the spirit of the game”.

Sreesanth delivered a beamer to Kevin Pietersen and later a two-foot no-ball to Paul Collingwood on the fourth day of the Trent Bridge Test. He also shouldered rival skipper Michael Vaughan, for which he was handed a fine of 50 per cent of his match fee.

Atherton said a beamer – whether bowled deliberately or not – was a serious offence, and asked Indian captain Rahul Dravid to set the right example by benching Sreesanth for the final Test, starting from Thursday at The Oval.

“If bowled deliberately, there cannot be a more cowardly action (than a beamer) on a cricket field. If bowled accidentally, it is still potentially lethal. Either way it should incur an immediate one-match ban,” Atherton wrote in Sunday Telegraph.

“Since the match referee Ranjan Madugalle was silent on the issue, it is Rahul Dravid who should take the appropriate disciplinary action ahead of the Oval Test. “Only one man, Sreesanth himself, knows whether it was deliberate. But I have no doubt that Sreesanth’s rancorous spell ... was the most glaring in the match of something that ran completely counter to the spirit of the game.” Sreesanth immediately apologised to Pietersen but Atherton doubted his sincerity. “It seems to me that the apology is irrelevant. The damage could have been severe,” he wrote. “Moreover, an apology doesn’t necessarily mean it is sincere. With match referee on the prowl, any bowler with an ounce of survival instinct is bound to apologise.”

He pointed out that there was a glaring absence of extenuating circumstances when Sreesanth bowled the beamer. “The ball was not new and the lacquer had worn off, making it less likely to slip out of his hand. It wasn’t wet, he had directional problems but hardly of the ‘yips’ variety.”

Atherton said that by fining Sreesanth for a shoulder nudge ... and ignoring the beamer, the International Cricket Council has once again shown a liking for the irrelevancies over issues that matter. He felt that the hullabaloo over the England players throwing jelly-beans at Indian batsmen overshadowed the Sreesanth episode. It (bean-gate) was a puerile prank gone wrong; harmless, silly and unlikely to be repeated,” he said. — PTI

Printer friendly page
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail