|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, November 18, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Next
Regulatory Authority for pension fund favoured
MUMBAI, NOV. 17. The union government should set up a regulatory
authority for pension funds with specific functions for its
proper growth, chairman of Insurance Regulatory and Development
authority of India, Mr. N. Rangachary, said today.
``We feel that there should be a regulator first to supervise the
entire pension fund system and prudential regulations be put in
place', Mr. Rangachary said, addressing a seminar on pension
sector reforms organised by Federation of Indian Chamber of
Commerce & Industry here.
The regulator could be entrusted with various functions to decide
on how and at what pace the pension funds should grow, he added.
Referring to the IRDA report on pension reforms in the
`unorganised sector' submitted to the Finance Ministry on October
31, he said ``The earliest we can install a system is 10-12
months''. However, if some regulatory changes were necessary,
then it would take more time - two to three years.
IRDA, in its report, has suggested that the annuity receipts
should be exempted from taxes, he said.
``We have opted for no cap on number of pension providers and a
selection process for providers, which are two issues different
from the recommendations in the oasis (old age security and
income system) report'', the IRDA chief said.
In the prevailing environment, investment of pension funds in
equity was not advisable, he said.
The committee has also indicated that investment in index funds
is a viable option, where one feels, that volatility gets
properly regulated, Mr. Rangachary added.
He said pension funds management consists of four integral parts
- collection, administration, investment and payout stage, which
should be exclusively reserved for insurance companies.
Prospective pension fund managers should have good track record,
knowhow and be financially sound, among other things.
He said the cost of initiating the process should be borne by the
Government or the regulator while cost of implementing and
marketing the schemes has to be taken up by the providers.
``We are also concerned about the transaction costs, which in
initial stages is bound to be high," Mr. Rangachary said, adding,
there would be ceiling on cost.
Central provident fund commissioner Mr. Ajai Singh said ``Our
goal is to cover 50 million people in three to four years and 70-
80 million in eight to 10 years. ``We also need to reform the
employee provident fund to cover about 80 lakh people by end of
the next year'', he added.
FICCI past president Mr. A. S. Kasliwal said India has an
estimated 314 million workers of which a mere 11 per cent were
covered by the formal pension system. The existing pension system
for a small amount of working population based on defined benefit
formula adds on heavily to the state's fiscal deficit. In fact,
it is estimated that if the present system were to continue then
in a decade's time the pension expenditure of the government
would exceed over five per cent of the gross domestic product, he
added.
- PTI
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Next : Dr. Reddy's loses exclusivity | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|