|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, November 13, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Next
Wright looking for the right balance
By G. Viswanath
EAST LONDON, NOV. 12. `It's a question of finding the right
bowling combination for the second Test. We have a fair idea what
the batting is going to look like,'' said the Indian cricket team
coach John Wright before undertaking a three and a half hour bus
journey to Port Elizabeth after match officials called off
India's four day game against South Africa `A', with the ground
conditions at the Buffalo Park here far less than ideal. The
match was scheduled to finish on Tuesday.
What is now significant is that the loss of the two warm up
games, one before the first Test and now before the second, has
exposed the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) lack of
professionalism with respect to the drawing up of a tour
itinerary. ``We played the first Test straight after a one-day
final. now it's going to be from one Test to another and to the
third,'' said Wright.
After officials called the match off, the team decided to advance
its departure to Port Elizabeth where the second Test is to start
on November 16. The team was told that the weather had improved
at Port Elizabeth where India lost to Kenya in a tri-series
league match. Not to be dragged into any controversy on the
facilities at the Buffalo Park, Wright jested: ``well some people
have rechristened Buffalo Park as `Water Buffalo Park.''
Wright, whose contract with the BCCI is due for renewal three
day's from now, gave his views on the forthcoming two Tests. ``We
are capable of beating South Africa and my immediate aim is to
achieve that,'' he said during a meet with the press.
Excerpts:
About the second tour match being abandoned.
A: To be honest we might have got some play yesterday, but it
rained in the afternoon. Even with the super sopper we would have
struggled to get the game going on the first day.
I think, with tight schedules in international cricket, we must
insist on all the facilities being in place at such venues. There
are not many games leading to Test matches because of the amount
of international cricket that is being played. We must have every
possible facility from the point of ensuring that we will not
lose games unless it is actually raining.
I think Chatsworth, in particular, was a great example. The
weather was fine there, but there was no super sopper and no
proper drainage facilities. Here it was a little different. It
hasn't stopped raining since we arrived here. At the most we
might have got two hours of play on the first day and that's
about it.
Connor Williams has lost a match. Do you think he would have come
into the reckoning if he had scored a big hundred?
A: Well, if he had got runs, he would definitely have been in
contention. We needed players to get runs in this game but it did
not happen. Now we just have to make sure that our practice
sessions are really intense. We hope to have an open net
tomorrow. The rain has affected our bowling more than our
batting.
It is going to be a difficult situation for the players. You are
asking them to step up a level, when they have had virtually
nothing, but net practice. It is a difficult situation, but we
are going to respond to it. Obviously we will have to have a look
at the wicket there at Port Elizabeth.
About Dravid opening the innings again.
A: The absence of a lead game before the first Test was the
reason Dravid had to take his place in the team as an opener. We
had to balance the side properly faced with a wicket which
induced or encouraged more seam than spin. Our best bowlers are
our spinners. So in my mind they must play. If we are going to
bat right till six then it gives the opportunity to play only two
seamers.
Dravid's form and figure has indicated that he is far more
profitable in the middle order. So we are really looking at that
situation. It is a choice between Dravid and V.V.S. Laxman to be
quite honest and may be Deep Das Gupta. At the end of the day,
people have to get runs in any position to earn specific spots.
They cannot say, `well I am gonna bat here and there. If you get
runs you are in the right to stand those positions. One can say
clearly about Dravid that he is in the right to play in the
middle order. He averages over 50 in Test cricket. He is a very
important part of our team. Against Australia we used him pretty
well, with him coming in at number six, and with Laxman batting
so well at three.
The opponent's shoulders may hang up, saying that we have Dravid
coming in at number three. It may be tough on Laxman, but then he
hasn't had a fifty in the last three Tests. So we have to look at
the situation.
Obviously we want to play our players where they feel comfortable
and believe that they can play their best. But sometimes the
needs of a team are greater than that of an individual.
Everything must be done in the interest of the team. This is
national team and it is not about where you choose or what you
choose. You are representing your country and you do your best
for your country wherever and whatever they may ask of you.
Sehwag has done well at No. 6, though he has some way to go
technique wise. He is learning. He is very exciting and can turn
a match. So probably we will not ask him to open, though I am yet
to speak to Sourav Ganguly.
What about the spinners?
A. Both must play. We did that in the last game (first Test) and
it was quite clear that two of seamers were going at six an over.
Would you take the same risk, especially looking at Anil Kumble
and Harbhajan's record even on wickets outside and against teams
that are far more comfortable against the medium pacers. We
really missed Harbhajan in the last Test match. Kumble pulled us
back after a poor start. Obviously you have to see the pitch
before deciding the bowling combination.
Tendulkar and Ganguly...they have to fill in the third seamers
spot. It is actually the ability to get through the 90 overs and
do that very cleverly. It is also about tactically using the
bowlers. Look at any side in world cricket. Glen McGarth, Jason
Gillespie, Brett Lee and Shane Warne, that's it for Australia.
The South African's are different as they have a Jacques Kallis.
That's where we miss an all-rounder. We can well go in with five
bowlers if the grass is a bit long.
You also have to take a look at the quality of the bowling. Four
quality bowlers can still do the job. You have got to look at
things like stamina and performance.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Next : Rain forces draw; Zimbabwe disappointed | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|