|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, November 03, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Previous
| Next
No smoking law becomes effective
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, NOV. 2. If you're are ``dying'' for a smoke, it would
be a good idea to think twice. Health reasons apart, effective
from today is the directive from the Supreme Court banning
smoking in public places.
And while the administration considers the directive as a step in
the right direction, for the general public and smokers, in
particular, the directive ``will probably have no effect
whatsoever''.
Although a law banning smoking in public places has been in place
in the Capital since 1997, the Delhi Health Minister, Dr. A.K.
Walia, feels the Supreme Court directive will ``help increase
awareness'' and thereby facilitate its implementation.
``Even though Delhi has had such a law, we have been confronted
with situations where people coming from outside the State are
unaware about the law. Now, this problem would be resolved and we
can take action comfortably,'' said Dr. Walia.
The order banning smoking in public places includes hospitals,
health institutes, public offices, court buildings, educational
institutions, libraries as well as auditoria. It also extends to
modes of public transport, including the Railways.
The Railways, however, like the Delhi Government have already
implemented a ban on smoking on its property, be it platforms or
trains. According to the Chief Public Relations Officer, Northern
Railway, Mr. Davinder Sandhu, ``our resolve will be strengthen
through the Court's order''.
For those who have been championing the cause of anti-smoking
laws, the directive by the Supreme Court is a ``welcome move''.
Tjhe Chairman Heartcare Foundation and cardiologist, Dr. K.K.
Aggarwal declared the directive to be a ``positive step and one
that would further assist the enforcement of anti-smoking laws.''
The ``affected'' community, however, does not seem concerned
about the directive. ``Such a law has been in effect in Delhi
from 1997, but I have never been stopped from smoking. I don't
think the situation will be any different now,'' said Anchal, a
student.
But for the general public, several who have been disillusioned
by the implementation of the law so far, the order would ``most
likely be just another directive''. ``Even though an anti-smoking
law has been in effect in Delhi for the past four years, I have
seen several people smoking in public places especially in
buses,'' said Aarti Malhotra, a management student. Another
resident of Delhi, Ms. Gulrukh Parmar, declared that in a country
like India, this order will most likely have no effect
whatsoever.
However, only time will tell whether non-smoking signs will
finally have effect in the Capital.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Previous : Monumental blunder, monumental murder Next : MLAs to be included in DPCC | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|