|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, October 23, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
U.S. wary of dominant role for Northern Alliance
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
NEW YORK, OCT. 22. There is growing irritation in the leadership
of the Northern Alliance on the kind of support its forces are
getting from the United States. According to military officials,
the Alliance is raring to close in on Kabul but is not getting
the kind of support it requires though the ground has been
softened through two weeks of intense bombardment.
There is a clear political and diplomatic reason why the Bush
administration has not thrown its full weight behind the forces
of the Northern Alliance - there is yet to be a firm movement on
the issue of an interim government in Kabul that will take over
from the Taliban.
Washington is sufficiently worried about any dominance of the
future arrangements by the Northern Alliance. Much of the
apprehension has to do with the Alliance's track record of
governance during the 1990s. Pakistan, a key ally in the current
campaign, is staunchly opposed to a Government in Kabul run by
the Northern Alliance or dominated by it.
Within the Northern Alliance there seems to be some rumblings on
how a post-Taliban political set-up should look like. Key leaders
are against any role for the Taliban, even the moderate ones.
``There is no place for the Taliban. All their leaders are
narrow-minded,'' a military commander of the Alliance has been
quoted.
Meanwhile, senior military and civilian officials at the Pentagon
are refusing to divulge what is happening on the ground in
Afghanistan by way of continuing commando actions. The reason for
the secrecy is for the safety of the troops, it is maintained.
``I doubt if a coach is going to give away his game plan for
today before he executes that plan. I think the American people
understand why we have to keep the details of our operations
confidential,'' the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen.
Richard Myers, said.
It is being said that the U.S. had the Taliban leader, Mullah
Mohammad Omar, in sight about two weeks ago. But there are two
versions of what happened next: one is that the pilotless
Predator plane spotted him and fired a missile that missed; the
other is that Mullah Omar was in a mosque and therefore it was
decided not to take him out then.
The U.S. has dismissed Taliban claims that it had killed some 20
to 25 American soldiers near Kandahar. A Taliban Minister had
said that a helicopter carrying the American service personnel
was brought down. Washington maintains that there have been only
two combat-related casualties in an incident in Pakistan.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Civilians being targeted: Taliban Next : U.K. acknowledges India's concern on cross-border terrorism | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|