|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, October 05, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
HC notice on complaint by Advani's daughter-in-law
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, OCT. 4. The Delhi High Court has issued notices to the
Lieutenant-Governor of Delhi and the Police Commissioner on a
complaint by Ms. Gauri Advani, wife of Mr. Jayant Advani (son of
the Union Home Minister, Mr. L.K. Advani), seeking a direction to
the city police to register a case against the Deputy High
Commissioner of India in the U.K., Mr. H.S. Puri, for allegedly
threatening her to give her consent for divorce.
A Division Bench of the Court comprising Ms. Justice Usha Mehra
and Mr. Justice C.K. Mahajan directed the Lieutenant- Governor,
the Police Commissioner and the Tilak Marg police, who allegedly
refused to register the case, to file their replies to the
petition by October 17.
Ms. Gauri Advani, a solicitor in London, was married to Mr.
Jayant Advani on December 10, 1991.
The petition, filed through counsel for Ms. Gauri Advani, Mr.
Lovkesh Sawhney and Ms. Kanchan Singh, alleged that Mr. H.S. Puri
had called her at his office to discuss her marital life.
When she reached Mr. Puri's office, the Deputy High Commissioner
allegedly told Ms. Gauri that Mr. L.K. Advani had authorised him
to ``discuss intimate details of her marital life,'' the petition
said.
When Ms. Gauri protested against Mr. Puri's attempts to interfere
in her personal life, the diplomat forced the petitioner to stay
in his office and discuss her marital problems, the petition
alleged.
Mr. Puri, quoting the Union Home Minister, allegedly threatened
Ms. Gauri with dire consequences if she refused, as desired by
Mr. L.K. Advani, to quietly agree to divorce her husband, the
petition alleged.
After being threatened by the Deputy Commissioner, the petitioner
contacted her father in Delhi, and on the suggestion of her
father, lodged a complaint with the High Commissioner of India in
that country against his deputy, but no action was taken, the
petition said.
Thereafter, the petitioner filed a complaint with the Tilak Marg
police here against Mr. Puri.
The police visited Ms. Gauri Advani's residence here to record
her statement under Section 161 of the Criminal Procedure Code
but the petitioner was not available as she had gone to meet her
father who had been admitted to a hospital. He had reportedly
fallen ill after being informed of the incident by her daughter.
The police then fixed another date for recording the statement of
the petitioner's brother but the investigating officer did not
turn up that day. When the petitioner called her up, the police
officer said that she would record her statement on May 5, 2000,
but she did not turn up, the petition said.
The police officer called the petitioner later that day to inform
that ``she is under tremendous pressure not to proceed with the
registration of the case,'' the petition alleged.
However, the petitioner sent her statement to the Police
Commissioner and the Tilak Marg police by registered post, the
petition said.
The petitioner's brother also contacted the External Affairs
Minister regarding the complaint where he found that the file
relating to the matter had been summoned by the Home Minister and
was lying in his office, the petition alleged.
Ms. Gauri Advani alleged that the police had refused to register
the case and investigate the allegations against Mr. Puri under
pressure from the office of the Home Minister.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : `Maharaj was blessed by Lord Indra' Next : Panels to oversee decontrol of petroleum prices | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|