|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, September 21, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Karnataka `deliberately withholding' water: T.N.
By J. Venkatesan
NEW DELHI, SEPT. 20. The Tamil Nadu Government in its suit filed
in the Supreme Court has accused Karnataka of deliberately and
wilfully defying the interim orders of the Cauvery Water Disputes
Tribunal though it was duty-bound to give effect to the orders
every year.
In its suit filed on Wednesday, Tamil Nadu submitted that it was
constrained to move the apex court as despite various requests
made for urgent release of water in compliance of the interim
order, Karnataka had failed to release any water.
The suit said that with a combined storage of 91.97 tmcft.
(thousand million cubic feet) as on September 18 as against its
gross capacity of 114.5 tmcft., Karnataka was unjustified in
holding the water to meet its summer irrigation requirements from
January 2002 while the standing crops in 2.65 acres in Tamil Nadu
were withering for want of irrigation supplies.
The suit stated that the storage at the Mettur reservoir was only
8.36 tmcft. as against the capacity of 93.5 tmcft. The release of
Cauvery waters was being made at the whims of Karnataka inasmuch
as only the surplus water flows into the Mettur reservoir. The
scheme framed by the Union of India for the implementation of the
interim order had failed to ensure and protect the rights of
inhabitants of Tamil Nadu.
The Tamil Nadu Government had also cited several instances in the
past as to how the meetings of both the Monitoring Committee and
the Cauvery River Authority, constituted pursuant to the Supreme
Court orders in 1998, had failed to yield any result.
This year also, the Monitoring Committee, which met on September
6, did nothing even though it was informed about the critical
situation in Mettur and the need for Karnataka releasing at least
one tmcft. a day for the next one or two months.
Similarly, the State was reasonably apprehensive about the
meeting of the Authority convened by the Prime Minister at the
instance of the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister being held on September
22. It was also apprehensive whether any decision would be taken
on that day to release water and whether Karnataka would give
effect to such a decision, even if the meeting took place.
The suit stated that Karnataka, despite having almost full
storage in its major reservoirs, had repeatedly refused to fulfil
its obligation to release waters in terms of the interim award.
It was contended that Cauvery was an inter-State river and Tamil
Nadu had as much right to the use of its water as Karnataka. Just
because Karnataka was an upper riparian State, it had no
exclusive right to impound the water flowing through its
territory as it pleased.
Karnataka had no right to decide unilaterally what pertained to
an inter-se right between that State and Tamil Nadu, nor could it
constitute itself as a Judge in its own cause. Also it was not
open to Karnataka to decide on its own whether a particular
agricultural year was a year of distress for lack of adequate
rain.
The Tamil Nadu Government stated that the present storage
position was barely sufficient to meet the requirement for the
next five days. Karnataka without prejudicing the interests of
its farmers could at least release one tmcft. of water daily upto
the end of October, the suit said and sought an interim direction
to this effect. In addition, Karnataka was also required to make
good the shortfall incurred during the current irrigation year.
The suit, among other things, sought a declaration that Karnataka
was under the Constitutional and legal duty to obey, implement
and give full effect to the interim orders of the Tribunal dated
June 25, 1991 and subsequent related orders dated April 3, 1992
and December 19, 1995.
It also wanted a declaration that the Cauvery River Authority was
duty-bound to ensure and give full effect to the interim order
and restrain Karnataka from impounding, at its will, the water
flowing through its territory stored in all its four major
reservoirs to the detriment of the rights of Tamil Nadu.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Cabinet discusses Musharraf's speech Next : Evacuate stranded Hindus, Sikhs from Afghanistan: NCM | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|