|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 16, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
The nation's body
Joseph Alter, an American anthropologist, claims to study not
Gandhi's words but his body, the many things he did with and to
it. He also looks at the body as providing a skeletal structure
for an alternative history of nationalism, says SUNIL KHILNANI.
"WE Indians made Gandhi into a Mahatma, now it is time to bury
the old man. There is enough pigeon shit on his statues in any
case". These words, cited by Joseph Alter in the conclusion to
his book, were spoken to him in 1999 by a young computer
technician, an active member of the militant right-wing Hindu
organisation which is propping up the current Indian government
(and in the past inspired Gandhi's assassins). Inadvertent irony
apart (bury?), it is true that such encrusted figurines of the
Mahatma's body are pretty much the extent of his tangible
presence in India today. But, if one ought to be alarmed by the
enmity Gandhi now provokes in India, on the evidence of this book
one should also be concerned about those who are turning up to
befriend him. Alter, an American anthropologist interested in
Indian body builders, wishes to resuscitate Gandhi in all his
physicality: he claims to study not Gandhi's words but his body,
and to take seriously the many odd things he did with and to it.
Why did Gandhi advocate, practice and continually experiment with
vegetarianism and strict diets, fasting (sometimes unto death),
cold water friction baths, and celibacy (famously sleeping naked
with his grand niece in order to train himself in this)?
The embarrassments of Gandhi's body have been viewed as harmless
weirdness, as the acts and gestures of a great and noble soul,
upholding universal values, or as the tactics of a canny
political and moral blackmailer. Alter, rightly, is discontented
with these responses. Affirming, like every author of a new book
on Gandhi, "that Gandhi has been misunderstood", he claims that
Gandhi's bodily performances are the key to what Gandhi meant.
Like a scientist and inventor, Gandhi experimented with and
analysed his self and body - "experiment" was indeed a critical
word in his lexicon, signalled in the title of his autobiography,
My Experiments with Truth.
In fact, though, most of Alter's book is not really about Gandhi
at all. Like many American academics of a certain age, Alter has
ingested a good deal of Foucault (and a little Nietzsche), and
fortified with this he sets himself a grander and vaguer theme:
to examine the fate of the body during the colonial period, and
to chart the efforts of nationalism to make the body a field on
which to resist colonialism and stage the nation, creating a
community of healthy, self-governing citizens (or, as he puts it:
"on account of the complex referentiality of somaticity in India,
the body provides a kind of skeletal structure for an alternative
history of the nation"). To this end, Alter's larger project is
to write a history of yoga and its meanings.
Some insights are to be had from situating Gandhi in this
context. As was pointed out by historians like David Arnold,
Gandhi rejected Western medicine because he saw it as an
instrument that made colonised Indians dependent on and subject
to colonial policy: instead he advocated self-cure - diet,
exercise - as the basis of a public health policy which returned
agency to Indians. Alter tries to develop this, though for
someone who claims to be interested in Gandhi's practise rather
than writings, Alter's approach is studiously textual -
throughout the book, we are given little evidence of what Gandhi
did, but plenty of citations from his writings. Alter is right to
draw attention to Gandhi's Key to Health, the most popular of all
his books (but unread by academics). Here Gandhi outlines a
theory of the elements and their relation to bodily health - in
addition to earth, water, sun and air, he adds a fifth, the
untranslatable Akash. Struggling to render its sense (ether,
vacuum, nothingness), Gandhi produced perhaps his most
startlingly beautiful literary writing. Akash is the key to
Gandhian health, a hyper-ecological notion which describes man's
relationship to his atmosphere. Fasting is precisely the creation
of Akash, a healing vacuum, within one's own corporeal self.
Alter's interest in Gandhi soon lapses, as we move on to chapters
on wrestling and the up-take of yoga in India towards the end of
the 19th Century. Like so much of what Indians came to see as
distinctively Indian about themselves, yoga in its modern form
came to India via the West, and Alter has some interesting
remarks on this. Until the 20th Century, Indians had not
practised yoga as a health aid: it was the translation into
Indian languages of books by German naturopaths - especially
Kuhne, with his doctrine of the Unity of disease - which from
1894 onwards prompted a fashion for yoga as an everyday self-
cure. The "reinvention of yoga as therapy" was an attempt to find
an alternative to Western medicine: it had therefore to be
presented as a precise science, and this also was a way of
affirming the superior sophistication of Indian civilisation.
Alter inclines towards the anthropological technique of bricolage
rather than argument, but his use of it is wooden and forced. No
overall argument ever takes off - instead we get a lot of
Foucauldian wing-flapping and stumbling between the portentous
and the pretentious ("the body is a site of power, and it's my
view it is that precisely because it articulates, on the level of
the anatomy and physiology, muscles and morals, elements and
erotics, the tension between 'me' and 'us' and the struggle
therein, over what 'we' is in terms of both local action and
global vision"). We wait in vain for the promised "alternative
history of nationalism" or "Third World critique of modernity",
and along the way we are treated to some rather worrying errors
in a book that purports to be a study of Gandhi (contrary to the
assurance of the glossary, swadeshi was certainly not "a term
coined by Gandhi in the context of the freedom struggle"). The
first sentence of the author's Acknowledgements states: "This is
a curious book in the sense that I did not know it was being
written as such until all of its various parts had been
completed". It is curious in other senses too, not least in that
even with all the parts ostensibly completed, it remains unclear
to what extent they constitute a book - a connected piece of
thinking on a specific subject.
Gandhi's Body: Sex, Diet, and the Politics of Nationalism, Joseph
S. Alter, University of Pennsylvania Press, p.216, £26.
Sunil Khilnani is Reader in Politics at Birkbeck College,
University of London and author of The Idea of India (2nd edition
1999). He is writing a biography of Jawaharlal Nehru.
This article was first published in The Times Literary
Supplement, March 2, 2001.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Tackling communalism Next : An abyss unbridged | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|