|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 16, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Science & Tech
Science lends a helping hand
REMOTE sensing and its applications, particularly with regard to
space platforms or satellites, has played a crucial role in the
area of renewable resources and stabilising agriculture. While
remote sensing per se cannot solve any specific problem related
to agriculture, its role as a powerful tool in monitoring and
identifying areas which need attention is increasing rapidly.
This is mainly because of the rapid improvement in spatial
resolution of data. Moreover much progress has been made in
overcoming cloud penetration as well as three-dimensional
mapping.
Remote sensing data from satellite altitude can be got directly
in digital form and this is used with other information also in
digital form. This has led to unlimited scope to support near
real time decisions using the technology tool of Geographical
Information System (G.I.S.). The additional use of the Global
Positioning System has made it possible to relate this data to
its location. These technological developments help improve
location specific agricultural practices. Such precision farming
improves productivity as minimum inputs are required. Thus
production cost comes down.
Toward this end, the Government has in the last 20 years
initiated land reforms and systematic land use. Unfortunately,
these plans have not been very successful. Our land records and
cadastral maps are only reasonably acceptable. Most land records
are either defective or inaccurate, or do not exist. There could
be several reasons for this. This situation cannot be set right
by digitising all cadastral maps, but only those which are
reasonably accurate or within an acceptable tolerance limit. This
situation prevails only in some regions. So a resurvey has to be
done in those areas where records are inaccurate. This is a
gigantic task as our land holdings are, in general, small. Such
farmers have to be convinced that they will not lose as a result
of this enmasse digitisation. Farmers who hold large areas form
only about 30 per cent of their population.
Therefore, to segregate small farmers from well-to-do farmers,
satellite data can be of immense use. These statistics can be
complemented with collateral information, provided the cadastral
maps are reasonably accurate.
We have been holding many seminars and expert consultations as to
how science and technology could be applied to ensure food
security on a sustainable basis, and come out with many laudable
remedial measures and recommendations. But how these could be
evolved into real time field activities is not clear. By
undertaking some demonstrations and trying to help a few limited
rural poor will not eliminate poverty or lead to self sufficiency
in food. This is because as our population is increasing, so too
is poverty - perhaps at a rate faster than that of food
production and purchasing power. Hunger and thirst surely cannot
wait for too long.
In this context, high resolution remote sensed data can at least
identify areas where the situation is bad and also where water
can be made available. For this not only should scientists and
technologists work together but a number of committed social
scientists and NGOs should work in areas where a number of
marginal farmers are living. In fact, poverty eradication can
even be viewed as a business proposition, by a partnership
approach of the Government and private people working together.
Another aspect that should be kept in mind is that consumer
preferences to different kinds of food is changing. So, producers
have to re-orient their programmes and targets. It is here that
the Government and NGOs play an important part, between consumer
preferences and producers. While remote sensing by itself may not
be able to help, it can at least help identify sources. With the
application of G.I.S. we can get realistic answers. Are we, as a
community, tuned towards this, and are we capable of working
together for a common cause, exchanging data with different
organisations freely and with an open mind? Our Governmental
systems and political set up do not seem conducive to implement
such a move, even if it takes time.
Towards better farming methods and improving productivity, we may
think of evolving a computerised land information system, similar
to the G.I.S.. This can be applicable to merging or integrating
renewable resources, for arriving at different alternative
approaches, for which a one-time infrastructural investment may
be necessary. Are we prepared for it and can we make a start with
available resources? Some of these could be partially answered by
technological skills got from aerial/satellite remote sensing and
considering land as a three-dimensional entity.
There is also the issue of bio-engineered food production to
produce more, but what it would result in over a period of time
is still being debated. We see the slowdown in information
technology which once grew very fast. Many dotcom establishments
now show signs of weakness. New technologies like Nano technology
are emerging silently. To what extent they would occupy and
replace many micro technologies is yet to be seen.
One generation, one technology, one type of practice and need
cannot be matched with another. Nor can we say when it will end
or slow down in the new generation. For a country like ours,
unless agriculture improves and the GNP reaches two or three per
cent our industrial production will not be able to grow beyond
certain limits, as 60 per cent of our activities are rural based.
Agricultural productivity and industrial growth are closely
inter-related. Remote sensing is not an exclusive technology in
achieve increased food production and eradicating poverty but,
used judiciously, it can provide information leading to increased
productivity.
New technology, such as precision agriculture, is being practised
in many other countries. Here it is still in the nascent stage.
The Systems Rice Intensification (SRI) programme is practised in
some countries, but we do not seem to have much knowledge about
it. Our policy makers must be prepared to be open minded in
trying to see the merit in such practices.
L.R.A. NARAYAN
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Science & Tech | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|