|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, August 31, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Sri Lankan Tamil parties sceptical
By Nirupama Subramanian
COLOMBO, AUG. 30. The LTTE representative in London, Mr. Anton
Balasingham, today slammed the Sri Lankan Government on its talks
offer even as Tamil parties greeted the move with scepticism.
``Now the Government is facing a serious crisis politically and
is compelled to seek desperate measures to cling on to power.
Having failed to work out an agreement with the main Opposition,
the Chandrika regime is offering a new peace bid, claiming that
this is a reassessment of policy,'' Mr. Balasingham told the
TamilNet website. With this, the Government hoped to split the
Tamil parties from the Opposition United National Party (UNP), he
claimed. He pointed out that earlier the Government had
consistently rejected the LTTE's call for ceasefire and peace
talks.
The minority People's Alliance Government said on Wednesday that
it was prepared to talk to the LTTE with the help of the
appointed facilitator - Norway. In a shift from its earlier
position that there could be no ceasefire before talks, the
Government declared its readiness for a pre-talks truce and
willingness to implement measures to alleviate civilian hardship
in the LTTE-controlled areas.
The Government said it had hoped to invite the LTTE for talks
jointly with the UNP had the two parties been successful in
arriving at a power-sharing agreement. As there had been no
agreement, the Government said it was considering the option of
inviting the LTTE on its own for talks.
`Too late'
``The Government's offer is too late,'' said the Tamil United
Liberation Front (TULF) parliamentarian, Mr. Joseph
Pararajasingham. Along with eight other MPs from three Tamil
parties, Mr. Pararajasingham is a signatory to the UNP
spearheaded no-confidence motion against the Government.
It was to avert the no-confidence motion that the Government
began talks with the UNP on a power-sharing deal. The talks
collapsed on Tuesday.
The Tamil parties have said their decision to align with the UNP
was the result of the Government's unwillingness to talk to the
LTTE, its failure to respond positively to the LTTE's unilateral
ceasefire and its move to sideline the Norwegian facilitator, Mr.
Erik Solheim, from the process.
Mr. Pararajasingham said the Government's latest announcement -
offering a ceasefire ahead of talks - and the assurance to
implement measures that would alleviate the hardships to
civilians in the LTTE-controlled areas, appeared to be an
expedient move aimed at its own survival, and would not affect
the support of the Tamil parties to the UNP.
Other parliamentarians reiterated this view. ``At the moment, the
announcement sounds like a strategy to break us away from the
UNP. But for that to happen, we have to be convinced of the
Government's sincerity. Let the Government set a date for the
talks and call a ceasefire with the LTTE immediately,'' Mr. S.
Adaikalanathan, MP of the Tamil Eelam Liberation Organisation
(TELO), said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : 'We are exploring all options to stay in power' Next : Voting peaceful in historic E.Timor poll | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|