|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, August 22, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
'Basmati battle won'
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, AUG. 21. In a rejoinder to the outcry over the Texas-
based company, RiceTec, being given a patent on Basmati rice by
the United States Patent Office, the Commerce Ministry has
declared that India's objections have been upheld as the latest
decision rejects most of the original patent's claims. Echoing
the Ministry's viewpoint, the Research Foundation headed by
environmental activist, Ms. Vandana Shiva, described this as a
victory for India as RiceTec had been forced to give up the title
of its patent. In fact, the Foundation said, ``the Basmati battle
has been won by us.''
The Ministry clarified that the U.S. Patent Office had actually
accepted India's objections raised on the original RiceTec patent
granted in 1997. The U.S. company's patent has been restricted to
three rice strains which do not impinge on India's interest in
exporting Basmati rice to the U.S., it claims in an official
note. In effect, the action initiated by the Agricultural and
Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) has
resulted in cancellation of the ``wide scope'' claims posing a
potential threat to the export of Basmati rice. ``With these
claims being rejected, the commercial interests of Indian
exporters have been fully protected.''
Similarly, the Research Foundation says the patent holder now
cannot claim the unique qualities of Indian Basmati or the unique
name ``Basmati''.
The Ministry said RiceTec had been granted a patent for certain
strains of rice in 1997 and 20 claims were made in its
application. Claims 15 to 17 were considered a real threat to the
export of traditional or similar rice strains from India to the
U.S. Thus, claims 15 to 17 were challenged in April, 2000 by
filing a request for re-examination in the U.S. Patent Office to
safeguard India's commercial interests. On the filing of this
request, RiceTec surrendered claims 4 and 15 to 17.
Subsequently, the U.S. Patent Office found that a ``substantial
question of patentability'' affected the remaining claims. Hence
it accepted a submission made by the APEDA, and issued a formal
notice in March this year to RiceTec. In response, RiceTec
withdrew claims to the patent except claims 8,9,11,12 and 13,
which related to the specific rice lines developed by it and not
to any varieties or lines grown in India.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Curfew in Kargil Next : BJP MPs fear communal riots in U.P. | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|