|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, August 12, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Edifice of a new India
Lokmanya Tilak's four pillars of the structure of a new India -
boycott, swadeshi, national education and swaraj - can help
generate social synergy and in turn accelerate progress where
every citizen has an opportunity to lead a productive and healthy
life, says noted agricultural scientist, Dr. M. S. SWAMINATHAN
who received the Lokmanya Tilak Award in Pune on August 1.
ON July 29, 1920, a day before his death, Lokmanya Tilak said,
even while he was in a delirium, "I am quite sure that India will
not prosper unless it gets swaraj". The four pillars of the
edifice of a new India propounded over 90 years ago by Lokmanya
Tilak were, "boycott, swadeshi, national education and swaraj". I
would like to deal with their relevance to the India of today,
nearly 54 years after our independence from colonial rule.
The first pillar is boycott. What should we boycott today? The
foremost on my list is intolerance of diversity and pluralism in
terms of religion, gender, caste, class and political belief, and
secondly, unsustainable lifestyles. Unsustainable lifestyles
promoted by the greed revolution we see in our midst are leading
to the enlargement of the ecological footprint of humanbeings on
mother earth.
The ecological footprint, which is the average amount of land and
sea appropriated by each person for food, water, housing, energy,
transportation, commerce and waste recycling, is roughly one
hectare in developing countries, and 10 hectares in the United
States. If every citizen of this world aspires to reach the
consumption level of an average U.S. citizen, we will need to
least four more planet earths to fulfill such a desire. Gandhiji
drew our attention to such an untenable situation in the
following prophetic words: "nature provides for everybody's
needs, but not for everybody's greed."
We have reached a stage in medical technology where our hearts
can be replaced by artificial ones. Unfortunately, we cannot
easily get back the natural ecosystems and genetic resources we
drive to extinction.
Remaining silent spectators of the expansion of intra- and inter-
generational inequity is the greatest tragedy of our times.
Environmental degradation, economic and gender inequality and
jobless economic growth are growing concurrently with
unprecedented progress in biotechnology, information and space
technologies as well as the production of biological software for
sustainable development. Universities should become leaders in
promoting job-led economic growth and not jobless growth.
The second of the Lokmanya's pillars is swadeshi. In the
Lokmanya's time, the entire population of India, Pakistan,
Bangladesh and Burma, which were all part of the Indian empire
during the British rule, was about 300 million. Now, India alone
has a population exceeding one billion. Tonight, nearly 300
million children, women and men will go to bed partially hungry
in our country. We witness the irony of growing grain mountains
and hungry millions. The famine of food at the household level is
now due to a famine of jobs or livelihood opportunities.
With the globalisation of trade, we face a confrontation in terms
of cost and quality between products resulting from mass
production technologies, and those produced by the Gandhian
concept of production by masses. For example, the over 90 million
tonnes of milk produced now in our country is the result of the
hard work of nearly 90 million people, most of whom are women. In
contrast, the over 70 million tonnes of milk produced in the U.S.
involves probably less than 200,000 persons. The total number of
farm families in the U.S. is about 900,000 in contrast to over
105 million in India. This is because the onus of livelihood of
agricultural commodities is based on a careful analysis of their
impact on rural and urban livelihoods, particularly of those
living below the poverty line.
The recipe for poverty alleviation proposed by international
organisations and bilateral agencies is micro-enterprises
supported by micro-credit. National macro-economic policies and
global trade policies, however often threaten the survival of
micro-enterprises. There is no level playing field between the
technology, capital and subsidy driven macro-enterprises of the
industrialised countries, and micro-enterprises functioning under
conditions of poor infrastructure, low investment and high risk.
The fast expanding transnational supermarkets are threatening the
livelihoods of small scale traders and vendors. The absence of
venture capital for micro-enterprises further compounds the
problems of the poor. Safeguarding and strengthening the
livelihood security of the rural and urban poor should be the
bottom line of all trade and investment policies.
The Government of Bhutan has chosen Gross National Happiness as
the index of progress. The major components of this index are:
environment protection, economic growth, cultural promotion and
good governance. The component of cultural promotion includes
spiritual and ethnical values. Without ethics, technological
progress may become a curse rather than a blessing. Without the
same love for diversity and pluralism in human societies, as for
biodiversity in plants and animals, lasting human peace will not
be possible. The concept of Gross National Happiness represents a
swadeshi approach to governance, since it includes non-monetary
value systems in its measurement.
The swadeshi principle is even more relevant in technology
development and dissemination. The 2001 United Nations
Development Programme Human Development Report has proposed a
Technology Achievement Index (TAI) to measure the progress made
by countries in technological progress. The indicators used by
UNDP relate to technology creation as measured by the number of
patents and royalty received per capita, extent of diffusion of
old and recent innovations and human skills in terms of mean
years of schooling and enrollment in science, mathematics and
engineering. We have been ranked 63 in TAI out of 72 countries.
Our measure of technology creation should not be just the number
of patents, but should relate to science for basic human needs
like food, drinking water, shelter and work. Public science is as
important as proprietary science. Also, more attention is needed
to the development and adoption of socially relevant technology
delivery systems. Our position of global leadership in milk
production has become possible only because of power of scale
conferred on small producers through the organisation of
cooperatives.
Also, the emerging genetic and digital divides can be bridged
only by adopting the antyodaya model of development advocated by
Gandhiji. When technological empowerment begins with the poor and
among them with women, the diffusion of new innovations becomes
rapid. The antyodaya approach to technology dissemination results
in a win-win situation for all. The gap between know-how and do-
how is high in our country because of the absence of a swadeshi
approach, which also can help us to reach the unreached.
Whether literate or semi-literate, rural women and men take to
new technologies like fish to water, so long as the pedagogic
methodology is learning by doing and the programme structure is
based on the principle of partnership and not patronage.
Technology has been and, still is, a dominant factor in enlarging
in rich-poor divide. By enlisting technology as an ally in the
movement for economic, and gender equity, we can make significant
contributions to promoting gross national happiness.
Job-led economic growth requires concurrent attention to
technology and public policy. Unfortunately, unidimensional
teaching and thinking prevail in many of our academic
institutions, with the result that reaching the unreached seldom
receives priority in terms of technology development and
dissemination. Our experience with computer-aided rural knowledge
centres in Pondicherry indicates that adoption of the antyodaya
pathway of bridging the digital divide helps simultaneously to
bridge the gender, social and technological divides.
The third among the Lokmanya's four pillars is education. The
preliminary results of the 2001 census indicate the percentage of
those literate in the country to be 65.38. Female literacy is
54.16, while male literacy is 75.85 per cent. Thus, literacy for
all is still a far cry. We should push ahead with both a national
educational guarantee programme and a techniracy (i.e., learning
the latest technical skills through work experience) movement.
The digital revolution can help to promote a learning revolution.
Tilak placed great emphasis on the need for a free and fearless
media. Kesari and Mahratta were thus born "to discuss every
subject in an impartial manner, and in the light of what we think
to be true". Maharashtra experienced during 1896-97, the worst
famine witnessed during the colonial period. Through the columns
of Kesari, he fought for preventing misery and death, and
suggested a three-pronged strategy consisting of relief work,
remission of land revenue, and the grant of short-term loans.
The last of the four pillars is swaraj. Lokmanya Tilak's concept
of swaraj is similar to that of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who
described four essential freedoms in the following words in an
address to the U.S. Congress on January 6, 1941.
"In the future days, we look forward to a world founded upon four
essential human freedoms. The first is freedom of speech and
expression, everywhere in the world. The second is freedom of
every person to worship Good in his/her own way, everywhere in
the world. The third is freedom from want, which, translated into
action, means economic security at the household level. The
fourth is the freedom from fear, which, translated into world
terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point
and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a
position to commit an act of physical aggression against any
neighbour, anywhere in the world."
We are still far from assuring every person on our planet
Roosevelt's four freedoms. Tilak's vision of swaraj can be
realised only by ensuring that freedom from want and from fear
become basic human rights.
Thanks to the traditions set up by leaders like Lokmanya Tilak,
Pune has a high social capital. The Lokmanya's four pillars will
help generate social synergy and thereby accelerate progress in
achieving purna swaraj or a country where every child, woman and
man has an opportunity for a productive and healthy life.
I would like to end this response by quoting what Mahatma Gandhi
said when Tilak died.
"He will go down to the generations yet unborn as a maker of
modern India. Indians will revere his memory as a man who lived
for them and died for them. It is blasphemy to talk of such a man
as dead. The permanent essence of him abides with us forever. Let
us erect for the Lokmanya of India an imperishable monument by
weaving into our own lives his bravery, his simplicity, his
wonderful industry and above all, his love of his country."
The prize money that goes with this award will go to making a
small contribution to erecting such an imperishable monument for
the Lokmanya based on the philosophy contained in his immortal
Gita Rahasya, which lays stress on action, not renunciation. Our
monument to the Lokmanya is a programme titled, "every child a
scientist", which aims to empower children from socially and
economically underprivileged sections of the society with
knowledge relating to their body and health, as well as the
health of our environment and natural endowments.
The writer is Chairman of the M.S. Swaminathan Research
Foundation, Chennai.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Crossing over ... to peace Next : Eight days of bliss | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|