Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Sunday, August 12, 2001

Front Page | National | Southern States | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Entertainment | Miscellaneous | Features | Classifieds | Employment | Index | Home

Features | Previous | Next

Edifice of a new India

Lokmanya Tilak's four pillars of the structure of a new India - boycott, swadeshi, national education and swaraj - can help generate social synergy and in turn accelerate progress where every citizen has an opportunity to lead a productive and healthy life, says noted agricultural scientist, Dr. M. S. SWAMINATHAN who received the Lokmanya Tilak Award in Pune on August 1.

ON July 29, 1920, a day before his death, Lokmanya Tilak said, even while he was in a delirium, "I am quite sure that India will not prosper unless it gets swaraj". The four pillars of the edifice of a new India propounded over 90 years ago by Lokmanya Tilak were, "boycott, swadeshi, national education and swaraj". I would like to deal with their relevance to the India of today, nearly 54 years after our independence from colonial rule.

The first pillar is boycott. What should we boycott today? The foremost on my list is intolerance of diversity and pluralism in terms of religion, gender, caste, class and political belief, and secondly, unsustainable lifestyles. Unsustainable lifestyles promoted by the greed revolution we see in our midst are leading to the enlargement of the ecological footprint of humanbeings on mother earth.

The ecological footprint, which is the average amount of land and sea appropriated by each person for food, water, housing, energy, transportation, commerce and waste recycling, is roughly one hectare in developing countries, and 10 hectares in the United States. If every citizen of this world aspires to reach the consumption level of an average U.S. citizen, we will need to least four more planet earths to fulfill such a desire. Gandhiji drew our attention to such an untenable situation in the following prophetic words: "nature provides for everybody's needs, but not for everybody's greed."

We have reached a stage in medical technology where our hearts can be replaced by artificial ones. Unfortunately, we cannot easily get back the natural ecosystems and genetic resources we drive to extinction.

Remaining silent spectators of the expansion of intra- and inter- generational inequity is the greatest tragedy of our times. Environmental degradation, economic and gender inequality and jobless economic growth are growing concurrently with unprecedented progress in biotechnology, information and space technologies as well as the production of biological software for sustainable development. Universities should become leaders in promoting job-led economic growth and not jobless growth.

The second of the Lokmanya's pillars is swadeshi. In the Lokmanya's time, the entire population of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Burma, which were all part of the Indian empire during the British rule, was about 300 million. Now, India alone has a population exceeding one billion. Tonight, nearly 300 million children, women and men will go to bed partially hungry in our country. We witness the irony of growing grain mountains and hungry millions. The famine of food at the household level is now due to a famine of jobs or livelihood opportunities.

With the globalisation of trade, we face a confrontation in terms of cost and quality between products resulting from mass production technologies, and those produced by the Gandhian concept of production by masses. For example, the over 90 million tonnes of milk produced now in our country is the result of the hard work of nearly 90 million people, most of whom are women. In contrast, the over 70 million tonnes of milk produced in the U.S. involves probably less than 200,000 persons. The total number of farm families in the U.S. is about 900,000 in contrast to over 105 million in India. This is because the onus of livelihood of agricultural commodities is based on a careful analysis of their impact on rural and urban livelihoods, particularly of those living below the poverty line.

The recipe for poverty alleviation proposed by international organisations and bilateral agencies is micro-enterprises supported by micro-credit. National macro-economic policies and global trade policies, however often threaten the survival of micro-enterprises. There is no level playing field between the technology, capital and subsidy driven macro-enterprises of the industrialised countries, and micro-enterprises functioning under conditions of poor infrastructure, low investment and high risk. The fast expanding transnational supermarkets are threatening the livelihoods of small scale traders and vendors. The absence of venture capital for micro-enterprises further compounds the problems of the poor. Safeguarding and strengthening the livelihood security of the rural and urban poor should be the bottom line of all trade and investment policies.

The Government of Bhutan has chosen Gross National Happiness as the index of progress. The major components of this index are: environment protection, economic growth, cultural promotion and good governance. The component of cultural promotion includes spiritual and ethnical values. Without ethics, technological progress may become a curse rather than a blessing. Without the same love for diversity and pluralism in human societies, as for biodiversity in plants and animals, lasting human peace will not be possible. The concept of Gross National Happiness represents a swadeshi approach to governance, since it includes non-monetary value systems in its measurement.

The swadeshi principle is even more relevant in technology development and dissemination. The 2001 United Nations Development Programme Human Development Report has proposed a Technology Achievement Index (TAI) to measure the progress made by countries in technological progress. The indicators used by UNDP relate to technology creation as measured by the number of patents and royalty received per capita, extent of diffusion of old and recent innovations and human skills in terms of mean years of schooling and enrollment in science, mathematics and engineering. We have been ranked 63 in TAI out of 72 countries. Our measure of technology creation should not be just the number of patents, but should relate to science for basic human needs like food, drinking water, shelter and work. Public science is as important as proprietary science. Also, more attention is needed to the development and adoption of socially relevant technology delivery systems. Our position of global leadership in milk production has become possible only because of power of scale conferred on small producers through the organisation of cooperatives.

Also, the emerging genetic and digital divides can be bridged only by adopting the antyodaya model of development advocated by Gandhiji. When technological empowerment begins with the poor and among them with women, the diffusion of new innovations becomes rapid. The antyodaya approach to technology dissemination results in a win-win situation for all. The gap between know-how and do- how is high in our country because of the absence of a swadeshi approach, which also can help us to reach the unreached.

Whether literate or semi-literate, rural women and men take to new technologies like fish to water, so long as the pedagogic methodology is learning by doing and the programme structure is based on the principle of partnership and not patronage. Technology has been and, still is, a dominant factor in enlarging in rich-poor divide. By enlisting technology as an ally in the movement for economic, and gender equity, we can make significant contributions to promoting gross national happiness.

Job-led economic growth requires concurrent attention to technology and public policy. Unfortunately, unidimensional teaching and thinking prevail in many of our academic institutions, with the result that reaching the unreached seldom receives priority in terms of technology development and dissemination. Our experience with computer-aided rural knowledge centres in Pondicherry indicates that adoption of the antyodaya pathway of bridging the digital divide helps simultaneously to bridge the gender, social and technological divides.

The third among the Lokmanya's four pillars is education. The preliminary results of the 2001 census indicate the percentage of those literate in the country to be 65.38. Female literacy is 54.16, while male literacy is 75.85 per cent. Thus, literacy for all is still a far cry. We should push ahead with both a national educational guarantee programme and a techniracy (i.e., learning the latest technical skills through work experience) movement. The digital revolution can help to promote a learning revolution. Tilak placed great emphasis on the need for a free and fearless media. Kesari and Mahratta were thus born "to discuss every subject in an impartial manner, and in the light of what we think to be true". Maharashtra experienced during 1896-97, the worst famine witnessed during the colonial period. Through the columns of Kesari, he fought for preventing misery and death, and suggested a three-pronged strategy consisting of relief work, remission of land revenue, and the grant of short-term loans.

The last of the four pillars is swaraj. Lokmanya Tilak's concept of swaraj is similar to that of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who described four essential freedoms in the following words in an address to the U.S. Congress on January 6, 1941.

"In the future days, we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms. The first is freedom of speech and expression, everywhere in the world. The second is freedom of every person to worship Good in his/her own way, everywhere in the world. The third is freedom from want, which, translated into action, means economic security at the household level. The fourth is the freedom from fear, which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbour, anywhere in the world."

We are still far from assuring every person on our planet Roosevelt's four freedoms. Tilak's vision of swaraj can be realised only by ensuring that freedom from want and from fear become basic human rights.

Thanks to the traditions set up by leaders like Lokmanya Tilak, Pune has a high social capital. The Lokmanya's four pillars will help generate social synergy and thereby accelerate progress in achieving purna swaraj or a country where every child, woman and man has an opportunity for a productive and healthy life.

I would like to end this response by quoting what Mahatma Gandhi said when Tilak died.

"He will go down to the generations yet unborn as a maker of modern India. Indians will revere his memory as a man who lived for them and died for them. It is blasphemy to talk of such a man as dead. The permanent essence of him abides with us forever. Let us erect for the Lokmanya of India an imperishable monument by weaving into our own lives his bravery, his simplicity, his wonderful industry and above all, his love of his country."

The prize money that goes with this award will go to making a small contribution to erecting such an imperishable monument for the Lokmanya based on the philosophy contained in his immortal Gita Rahasya, which lays stress on action, not renunciation. Our monument to the Lokmanya is a programme titled, "every child a scientist", which aims to empower children from socially and economically underprivileged sections of the society with knowledge relating to their body and health, as well as the health of our environment and natural endowments.

The writer is Chairman of the M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai.

Send this article to Friends by E-Mail


Section  : Features
Previous : Crossing over ... to peace
Next     : Eight days of bliss

Front Page | National | Southern States | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Entertainment | Miscellaneous | Features | Classifieds | Employment | Index | Home

Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu

Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu