|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, August 08, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Jayalalithaa appeals: three advocates to help ex-AG
By Our Staff Reporter
CHENNAI, AUG. 7. The former Advocate-General, Mr. K. V.
Venkatapathy, who was appointed on June 23 by the Madras High
Court to conduct the criminal appeals of the Chief Minister, Ms.
Jayalalithaa, can have three advocates of his choice to assist
him in each appeal.
The direction was given today by the First Bench comprising the
Chief Justice, Mr. N.K. Jain, and Mr. Justice P. Thangavel, on a
memorandum filed on behalf of the former AG by Mr. R. S.
Bharathi, Alandur Municipal Chairman.
Fixing Mr. Venkatapathy's fee at Rs. 25,000 a day for effective
hearing, the Bench said no person other than the Public
Prosecutor should conduct the prosecution case.
``However, Mr. Venkatapathy can have his three independent junior
advocates on record to assist him in each criminal appeal. The
Government shall pay one-third junior fee per day for the
respective junior in each case for effective hearing''.
Rejecting Mr. Venkatapathy's plea for protection by Central
security force, the Bench said ``in our view it is not tenable,
because he has to discharge his duties as the officer of the
court. The court is to proceed with the appeals treating the
appellant to be single litigant''. It also cautioned the
petitioner that the court should not be allowed to be used by
anybody to settle political scores.
The Bench, however, put on record the fact that Mr. Venkatapathy
had withdrawn his demand for security. ``If he requires, the
State shall provide necessary protection to him and will also
provide adequate and full protection in the court premises till
the hearing is over''. Mr. Venkatapathy's request for the
services of the public prosecutor and the investigating officer
who had handled the original cases in the trial court was also
rejected by the Bench as `not necessary'.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : 191 villages prone to atrocities against Dalits: study Next : Prosecution evidence nearing completion | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|