|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, August 06, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Pooyamkutty project not viable
By Roy Mathew
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, AUG. 5. The proposed Pooyamkutty
hydroelectric project, which is being revived by the State
Government, will cause considerable environmental and economic
losses to the State. The project will submerge two of the three
remaining low-elevation forested valleys in the State and cripple
its economy.
The Chief Minister, Mr. A.K. Antony, who left for Delhi on Sunday
for Plan discussions, will be lobbying strongly with the Centre
for the project which is being pursued in spite of other
alternatives.
The Southern Western Ghats had 32 low-lying valleys but most of
them were destroyed by irrigation and power projects or converted
into plantations or farm lands in the past. Now, in the entire
reach of the ghats in Kerala, only three low-elevation valleys
(below 300 meters MSL) retain significant extent of natural
vegetation. These valleys are important as certain species of
trees and plants can grow only at this elevation. The Silent
Valley (above 900 metres MSL) or other high-elevation valleys are
not substitute for the Pooyamkutty valley and nearby Pichiyar
valley or the Kallar valley in Thiruvananthapuram district. (The
Vamanapuram irrigation project, if revived, will submerge Kallar
Valley).
So, if Mr. Antony succeeds in his mission, he would be striking
the last nail on the coffin of many a plant that once grew
profusely in the rain forests of Kerala.
Penny wise, pound foolish:
The Chief Minister is defending his action noting that the State
requires a higher hydro thermal mix to keep the power tariffs
low. However, the Kerala Forest Research Institute (KFRI) has
estimated that the environmental loss from the first phase of the
Pooyamkutty project would be Rs. 3,035 crores.
This is a 1989 estimate based on the Central Government's
guidelines. The projected losses would be higher now as more
importance and value is attached to biodiversity now. Even by the
original estimates, the cost benefit ratio would work out to be
negative.
The project will yield 645 million units of power a year. This is
not a big addition. The current availability of power in the
State is about 14,000 million units including power from the
Central pool. The hydel generation within the State constitutes
about 65 per cent of this.
The State loses as much as 2,068 million units a year by way of
transmission and distribution losses. Hence, 645 million units
can be saved if the transmission losses are brought down to about
19 per cent from the current 27 per cent.
There is scope for saving much more energy by promoting energy
efficiency. The savings from energy efficiency can be as high 65
per cent. This means that the State would not need additional
power stations in the near future and its problems in meeting
peak load would be solved automatically.
According to official figures, the gross wind energy potential in
the State is 831 MW, of which 605 MW is estimated to be the
usable technical potential. So far, the State has tapped only a
few megawatts (just 1.93 MW as per last year's figures).
When asked about using this potential at a Cabinet briefing, Mr.
Antony replied that the potential was not significant and the
State could not do without new hydel projects. Apparently, the
officials have not briefed him on wind energy potential and the
fact that the firm power potential of Pooyamkutty project is only
73.5 MW.
Whenever new Governments came to power in the State during the
past 15 years, it has become routine for them to start a debate
on Silent Valley with the intention of pressing the Centre for
the Pooyamkutty project. Though the politicians often speak for
the poor, they ignore the fact that the Pooyamkutty valley
supports the reed economy of the State.
As per 1989 figures quoted in the KFRI study, 26 per cent of the
reed supply to Hindusthan Newsprint and 48 per cent of the supply
to the State Bamboo Corporation come from the Pooyamkutty
forests. About 13,000 people depend on the supply directly and
about three lakh people would be affected if the reed economy is
crippled.
Much of the reed breaks in Pooyamkutty found in the area would be
submerged by the project. This area is under intense exploitation
and considerable degradation of the forests has taken place over
the years. However, if the area is submerged, reed cutters would
move to other areas with fewer reed breaks and richer forests.
The consequences for both the workers and the forests can be
imagined.
The following is a check list of what would be destroyed even in
a small area such as Pindimedu as per the KFRI study: Taxus of
Angio sperms - 340 species, timber species - 100, medicinal
plants - 174, food and fodder yielding varieties - 90, oil
yielding plants - 35, gum and resin yielding plants - 39, tan and
dye yielding plants - 40, fibre and floss yielding plants - 22
and spices and condiments yielding species - 5. The direct hit
would be taken by 267 families, mostly tribals, who live in the
submersible area and depend heavily on the forests for their
sustenance.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Provisional list sends corporators scurrying for seats Next : VS flays move to dissolve KAU general council | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|