|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, August 03, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
Corporate control over the Govt.
By Harish khare
NEW DELHI, AUG. 2. The debate on the US-64 scam in the Lok Sabha
today offered an instructive lesson in the country's political
economy. Speaker after speaker, cutting across the party divide,
alluded to the awesome powers that corporate houses had come to
exercise over the Government. And, the corporate house most often
cited was ``Reliance''.
It was left to Mr. George Fernandes, former Defence Minister and
convener of the ruling National Democratic Alliance, to note that
leaders and political parties were generally unwilling to name
the business house that was often suspected of bending rules to
its advantage. With characteristic bravado, Mr. Fernandes
asserted that he had no such fear and then named the Reliance
group.
Mr. Fernandes even mentioned that when another member, Mr. Rashid
Alvi (of the BSP) dared to take up cudgels against the Reliance
group, he was threatened, and that Mr. Alvi had to seek special
protection from the Union Home Minister. Earlier, Mr. Kirit
Somayya of the BJP cited chapter and verse to suggest that
``Reliance'' had taken the UTI to the cleaners.
But perhaps the most pointed observations were made by Mr. Alvi,
who had been carrying on, rather ineffectively, a campaign
against the Reliance group. The ruling benches heard him in pin
drop silence as the BSP member waved the letters he had received
from the Prime Minister in response to his complaints against the
Reliance group. He noted grimly that in none of his replies the
Prime Minister even offered to look into the allegations, and had
Mr. Vajpayee ordered a probe, perhaps the US-64 scam could have
been avoided.
Mr. Alvi noted that the corporate houses had acquired such a
clout that they could decide which Minister would get what
portfolio and which officer would be secretary in which ministry.
And, then, he cut close to the bone when he addressed himself to
the Finance Minister: ``You became Finance Minister because
``they'' did not want someone else to become finance minister (an
oblique reference to Mr. Jaswant Singh); but for some reason, you
have fallen out of their favour. That (corporate) House does not
want to see you continue as Finance Minister.''
Again, to the discomfort of both the Congress and the BJP
benches, Mr. Alvi read out excerpts from what he purported to be
the findings of a CBI inquiry in 1995.
This inquiry report, according to Mr. Alvi, had suggested
proceedings against the then UTI Chairman, other officers as well
as two directors of the Reliance group. Instead of acting as per
the findings, Mr. Alvi noted, the poor CBI inquiry officer found
himself transferred.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Don't aid public servant convicted of corruption: SC Next : A deviation of transfer norms: T.N. | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|