|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, July 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
An alternative to e-governance?
By Our Special Correspondent
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, JULY 23. Non-proprietary software may emerge
as an alternative to e-governance and e-education programmes in
the country with the inauguration of the Indian chapter of the
Free Software Foundation (FSF) here last week.
The president of the foundation, Mr. Richard M. Stallman, who
launched the activities of the chapter, called on the Kerala
Minister for Information Technology, Mr. P. K. Kunhalikutty, to
impress upon him the need to use Free Software for the
Government's computerisation programmes. Mr. Stallman will also
visit Hyderabad this week with a similar mission. He will be in
India for about a month to promote the use and development of the
software. At the moment, governments have only begun to consider
Free Software or the similar Open Source software as an option.
The Free Software Foundation, headquartered in Boston, U.S., is
dedicated to promoting computer users' rights to use, study,
copy, modify and redistribute computer programmes. The software
is supplied under a special General Public Licence that allows
users to modify the software, subject to the condition that
redistribution should be with the source code under the Public
Licence. The FSF India is the result of initiatives taken by a
group of Government officials and Free Software practitioners and
enthusiasts in India.
Speaking at the inaugural function here, Mr. Stallman said
computer users deserved the freedom to share and change software,
the way cooks share and change recipes.
A government that wants to implement vernacular language in a
proprietary Operating System (OS) has no alternative but to go to
the company that produced the software in the first place. That
company, on its part, will undertake to do this work only if it
made commercial sense. On the other hand, with a free OS, the
Government could adopt an existing product and produce a custom
implementation that can be distributed without any legal
problems.
There was no way to figure out what a proprietary programme does,
since executable code was not human-readable. Governments,
according to Mr. Stallman, were waking up to the fact that Free
Operating Systems were much more appropriate for applications of
national importance.
Along with the inauguration of the FSF India, FreeDevelopers, a
self-regulatory organisation of Free Software developers from
around the world, has also set up its branch in India. Free
software developers are now gearing themselves to offer a serious
challenge to Microsoft by developing DotGNU as a Free Software
alternative to the .Net services.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Pier not the villain in Kadalundi mishap: REC faculty | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|