|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, July 20, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Declarations difficult for Generals: Benazir
LONDON, JULY 19. The former Pakistan Prime Minister, Ms. Benazir
Bhutto, today put the blame squarely on the Pakistan President,
Gen. Pervez Musharraf, for his failure to sign a joint
declaration with India during the Agra summit.
``It was startling to witness his puerile brinkmanship where the
Indians called the bluff,'' the Pakistan People's Party chief
said adding the ``summit did prove that whilst politicians come
up with agreements, declarations are difficult for Generals''.
Commenting on the summit, the self-exiled leader, facing
corruption charges in Pakistan, said in a statement here that
``time was always running short - and then extended. Gen.
Musharraf departed when sources leaked that the talks would
continue the next day''.
She said the entire world was watching the ``Agra summit'' and
expected a joint declaration but eventually ``there was not even
a joint statement''.
``Blaming Pakistani politicians for succumbing to army pressure,
some in India believed they could do business with the army
instead. They found a self-confessing powerless army chief who
said he would have to live in India in his old Neharwali house if
he signed a declaration. The civilian leaders signed Simla,
Islamabad and Lahore (agreements)- all honourable agreements,''
she said.
Stating that diplomacy is the art of the possible, she said,
``political leaders are trained in the art of give-and- take.
General Musharraf is a military dictator. When he speaks, others
jump to attention. If they don't, they are locked away''.
Ms. Bhutto said Gen. Musharraf made key ``errors'' in the trip.
``He failed to build an internal consensus of legitimate
political forces.
He relied on an inefficient team which failed him previously.
With good advice, he could have stayed an extra day. Exhausting
the other side is a pretty elementary diplomatic trick. Instead,
he left in a huff,'' she noted.
Islamabad was keen for a declaration and New Delhi knew it. This
was confirmed by a Pakistani delegate who told the Gulf news, ``I
went up to the Indian Foreign Minister, Mr. Jaswant Singh, and
told him he could write what he wanted and we would accept it,''
she said.
Stating that it is extraordinary, Ms. Bhutto said, ``it is little
wonder that Mr. Jaswant Singh wanted another day of talks to put
in his wish list when the Islamabad side offered such
accommodation''.
``If there is a legacy to this summit, it is that New Delhi
managed to match Pakistan's commitment to the Kashmir dispute
with an equally vocal and high profile repetition of cross border
terrorism,'' Ms. Bhutto said. She recalled that since 1993, when
the diplomat, Mr. J.N. Dixit, offered to Pakistan, Kashmir as a
separate agenda item at the Commonwealth Conference at Cyprus,
the Indian side is willing to include Kashmir as the bone of
contention. ``But the interpretation of that contention is
different to Pakistan's,'' she said.
Ms. Bhutto said ``narrowing the focus to the words on a draft
statement, usually successfully manoeuvred by diplomats, is
ignoring the larger picture. That picture involves tense
relations between two nuclear capable States that fought three
wars and have daggers drawn at the Line of Control in the Kashmir
Valley''.
Ms. Bhutto said that a nervous world community pushed both
leaders towards the negotiating table to lessen tensions that may
prove fatal for ``South Asia, housing one-fifth of humanity''.
But Gen. Musharraf, she said, was hampered by his dependence on a
military constituency wedded to militancy. ``He lacked a popular
mandate and desired his nation's highest constitutional posts.
Given his agenda, ambitions, army, America and Afghanistan, Gen.
Musharraf played his cards well, except for the late night
departure.''
``Buying international time and goodwill in the run-up to the
summit, he seized the presidency, assumed Draconian powers under
the National Security Council, got another tranche of the IMF
loan and persecuted opponents,'' she said.
``In extending an invitation to the Indian Prime Minister, Mr.
A.B. Vajpayee, he held out the promise of another summit. More
time to choreograph a domestic political scenario by October
2002,'' she noted.
- PTI
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Deve Gowda praises Indian-Americans Next : Lashkar website back after a break | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|