|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, July 11, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
An explosive amalgam of brawn and brain
LONDON, JULY 10. Everyone knew Adam Gilchrist was a bit special,
even before the first Ashes Test. The wicket-keeper/batsman's
phenomenal 152 off 143 balls against England at Edgbaston on
Saturday merely reinforced the belief.
The 29-year-old Australian, however, reminded everyone of one
important point - that he is not your average number seven
slogger. Yes, his innings included more than a century in
boundaries - 20 fours and five sixes - and several trademark
`baseball' crossbats over long on and long off. But Gilchrist
rarely hits the ball with anything other than the sweet spot of
his broad bat.
He also amply demonstrated that he had the brain to back the
brawn when, fast running out of partners, he reached 99 not out,
with a last-man in Glenn McGrath at the other end. England set
the trap, moving a fielder back to deep square leg as Andrew
Caddick invited the hook with a bouncer off his last ball of the
over. It was all a bit too transparent for Gilchrist, who simply
rocked back on his back foot, held his bat head high and let the
ball run off its face and over wicketkeeper Alec Stewart's head
for four.
It was the sort of intelligent improvisation which has led to him
being named Steve Waugh's vice-captain. There was even a moment
of comic irony on Saturday. When Gilchrist and McGrath had put on
a half-century for the last wicket, television commentator Richie
Benaud, presumably with his tongue buried firmly in his cheek,
responded: ``that is a brilliant 50 partnership.''
Partnership? McGrath, at the time, was on nought and by the time
Gilchrist was out, they had put on 65, McGrath contributing a
battling single.
Gilchrist's meteoric rise and rise - he shares the world record
of six dismissals in a one-day international and has made ten
dismissals in a Test, one below the best performance of all time
- is all the more remarkable since he had such big boots to fill.
Gilchrist sat on the sidelines for years as Ian Healy's
understudy, not making his Test debut until 18 months ago - he
had broken into the one-day team three years earlier.
The ever-popular Healy eventually departed, an icon of Australian
sport. Many doubted that his successor would be able to match
him, particularly standing up to Shane Warne's leg-spin. Some
suggested, without malice, that Gilchrist did not have the soft
hands required to be a world-class keeper. Had he not, after all,
begun his Sheffield Shield career as a specialist batsman in
1992-3 before being forced to move from New South Wales to
Western Australia in an attempt to be treated seriously as a
wicket-keeper?
His perceived weakness behind the stumps, however, has not
stopped him completing 73 catches and five stumpings in 18 Tests
- a superior strike rate to Healy's record 366 catches and 29
stumpings in 119 games.
It is his batting, however, which continues to provoke sharp
intakes of breath. He now averages 52.09 in Tests, having already
scored 1,146 runs in his short career. His major contributions
have also come at critical times, each of his three Test hundreds
effectively winning the game.
His previous Test best was 149 not out, off 163 balls. That had
come against Pakistan in Hobart in November 1999, in only his
second appearance. Gilchrist had come to the wicket at 126 for
five, with Australia in trouble after being set 369 to win. He
and Justin Langer duly put on 238 to settle the game.
Not you average number seven slogger. Clearly.
- Reuters
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Boot spikes caused Tendulkar's injury Next : Quota system raises its ugly head again | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|