|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, June 30, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Graphite case: Special Court order against Mani quashed
By Our Staff Reporter
KOCHI, JUNE 29. The Kerala High Court on Friday set aside the
Thiruvananthapuram Vigilance Special Court's order impleading Mr.
K.M. Mani, Revenue Minister and leader of the Kerala Congress(M),
as fourth accused in the second module of the Graphite case.
Mr. Justice N. Krishnan Nair, however, made it clear that if the
special court came to the conclusion while adducing ``evidence in
the course of inquiry into or trial of the case'' that the
petitioner (Mr. Mani) was involved ``in the commission of the
offence'', the special court was at liberty to proceed in
accordance with the law.
Allowing a criminal revision petition filed by Mr. Mani against
the Special Court's order, the Judge observed that it was
"unfortunate to note" that the Special Judge had passed the
impugned order without understanding the scope of Section 319(1)
of Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.PC).
The Judge pointed out that evidence under Section 319(1) meant
evidence recorded by the court in the course of inquiry or trial
and not the statements made to the police during investigation.
The statements recorded under Section 161 of Cr.PC and the
documents submitted along with it could not be taken into account
for the purpose of Section 319(1).
Mr. Mani had contended that the findings of the Special Court
were against Section 319(1) of the Cr.PC. According to the
section, a person could be made an additional accused only when
it appeared to the court from "evidence recorded" in the course
of any inquiry into or trial of an offence that he/ she should be
arrayed an additional accused. In this case, no evidence had been
recorded by the court after charges had been framed in the case
against the other accused.
The court had also heard arguments advanced by Mr. P.A. Ahammed,
the resigned special prosecutor at the special court who had been
allowed by the judge to implead in the petition.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : KC(B) protests against UDF sidelining Pillai Next : KC(M) suspends P.C. Thomas | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|