|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, June 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
On the wrong foot
New Delhi was clearly caught off guard by the reaction to the
ceasefire extension, says Vinay Kumar.
NEW DELHI was clearly caught off guard by the angry reaction in
Manipur to the extension of the ceasefire with the NSCN to other
areas in the Northeast, apart from Nagaland.
As Manipur burnt and protesters took to the streets, New Delhi
began to realise that the situation may not have worsened to this
extent had there been no political vacuum. The absence of a
popular Government in Manipur was felt. Also, the Home Ministry
took note of the Samata Party's role in stoking public
apprehension.
The former Manipur Chief Minister, Mr. Radhabinod Koijam, had
forcefully informed the Centre that while the people were all for
peace in the region they were apprehensive of the ongoing
ceasefire affecting the territorial integrity of Manipur.
Though the Union Home Minister, Mr. L. K. Advani, stressed the
Government's commitment to protect the territorial integrity of
all Northeastern States, the articulation came after violence had
broken out in Imphal.
This highlighted New Delhi's insensitivity in failing to embark
upon political interaction and confidence-building measures with
the States concerned before the agreement in Bangkok. The accord
also failed to reject the ``Greater Nagaland'' demand of the NSCN
(I-M).
Reacting to the protests in Manipur, the NSCN said the demand for
a larger State and extension of ceasefire were two separate
issues. After a ceasefire agreement was clinched with the NSCN
(I-M) in August 1997, there was opposition to it in Manipur and
the then United Front leaders had reiterated that the ceasefire
was limited to Nagaland. Its extension now to all-Naga inhabited
areas has touched a raw nerve in Manipur where political
instability, insurgency and economic slowdown have also
contributed to making the situation volatile.
The Centre's interlocutor with the NSCN, Mr. K. Padmanabhaiah,
has emphasised that the basic intention of the ceasefire was to
ensure negotiations took place in a peaceful atmosphere.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : The spark that lit the powder keg Next : Only drops to drink | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|