|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, June 21, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Science & Tech
| Previous
| Next
Gamma bursts may create star forming regions
NEW FINDINGS from two X-ray satellites suggest that gamma-ray
bursts, some of the most intense blasts in the Universe, may be
created in the same area where stars are born.
Luigi Piro of the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) in
Rome, Italy, presented data from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory
and the Italian-Dutch ASI BeppoSAX observatory at the Gamma Ray
2001 conference in Baltimore. "We know that when a gamma-ray
burst explodes, it produces a blast of material called a
fireball, which expands at relativistic speeds like a rapidly
inflating bubble," said Piro, who works within CNR's Istituto di
Astrofisica Spaziale. "Our team found evidence that the blast
wave caused by the fireball brakes against a wall of very dense
gas, which we believe is the crowded region where stars form."
Several theories exist about what causes gamma-ray bursts. Among
more popular theories are that gamma-ray bursts come from various
combinations of merging neutron stars and black holes, or, from
the explosion of massive stars, called hypernovae.
"Because the ray bursts are going off in extremely distant
galaxies, it is difficult to `see' the regions that harbor them,"
said Piro. "We can only gather circumstantial evidence as to
where and how they form." His observations support the hypernova
model. Scientists believe that within dense star-forming regions,
the massive star required for a hypernova explosion evolves
extremely rapidly.
On astronomical time scales, the supermassive star would evolve
over the course of only about one million years. Thus, the
hypernova explosion may occur in the same stellar environment
that originally produced the massive star itself, and perhaps may
trigger even more star formation.
The hint that the ray bursts can occur in dense media came during
a Chandra observation of an afterglow that occurred on September
26, 2000. Prof. Gordon Garmire of Pennsylvania State University
found X-ray emission to be greater than that expected by the
standard scenario of a fireball in a low-density medium - an
important clue that the explosion occurred in a dense region.
Next, on February 22, 2001, Piro noted that Chandra observations
of the burst's afterglow, one of the brightest bursts ever
observed by BeppoSAX, provided evidence of a fireball expanding
in a very dense gas.
These recent results supported data from four other gamma-ray
bursts observed by BeppoSAX and Chandra (GRB970508, GRB990705,
GRB991216, and GRB000214). In these bursts the team found
evidence indicating that the burst had encountered an extremely
dense gas. The properties of this gas suggest that it originated
from a very massive progenitor before it exploded as a gamma-ray
burst.
A key element in the success of these observations has been the
perfect timing and liaison between the two satellites, Chandra
and BeppoSAX, according to Piro. Piro is the Mission Scientist
for BeppoSAX, the instrument that first detected X-ray afterglows
from gamma-ray bursts. Currently, astronomers are not usually
notified about gamma-ray bursts until an hour or so after they
occur.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Science & Tech Previous : Monitoring air pollution from space Next : Question Corner | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|