|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, June 21, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Panel-DPC meet makes little headway
By Mahesh Vijapurkar
MUMBAI, JUNE 20. A meeting between the Madhav Godbole Committee
and the Enron- sponsored Dabhol Power Company yesterday did not
make much progress mainly because the Centre's representative on
the panel continued to insist that his brief was only to be a
facilitator.
It was for the MSEB and DPC work out a new, attractive tariff
regime to ensure other States pick up the power from the
independent power producer.
In the absence of Mr. Godbole who is away overseas for a brief
period, the sitting was handled by Mr. E. A. S. Sarma. The
Centre's stand is that the two licencees should sustain the PPA
and the DPC drop its tariff and then it would help find buyers.
The Centre does not want to pick up power or find a Central
Government entity to do so and then sell it to those who need
energy. The MSEB is quite averse to this because it cannot pick
up power generated at Dabhol at say Rs. 7 per kwhr and then sell
it to some State for about Rs. 2.50 and bear the loss.
Sources say that as of now, even the Centre's thinking is on the
same lines and it would therefore, not be a common buyer.
As a facilitator it will find buyers if the MSEB is able to
purchase power at a renegotiated lesser price from the DPC.
Maharashtra Government sources say that the ``Centre should
become a common buyer and become a seller. There is no other
way.''
At the very second meeting, the Godbole Committee itself had
sought to impress upon the Centre's representative, Mr. V. A.
Gokak, that unless the Centre intervened, there was no light at
the end of the tunnel.
The hope was that the Centre would be brought around to be more
than a mere facilitator. That, apparently has not happened and
those familiar with discussions within the panel say ``we are
where we were''.
It is precisely because of the inability to absorb high costs
that the MSEB moved to negotiate and sees no reason why it should
bear the risk continually when its own finances are far from
healthy.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Advancing of deadline to end VSNL monopoly puzzling Next : Ayodhya case: CBI challenges Special Court order | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|