|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, June 21, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
It was a vote for Ram temple, claims VHP
By Neena Vyas
NEW DELHI, JUNE 20. The Vishwa Hindu Parishad today asserted that
the Lok Sabha had, in fact, ``already approved'' the building of
a Ram temple at the disputed site at Ayodhya.
Swami Chinmayanand, BJP MP and VHP leader, said the discussion
and vote in the Lok Sabha during the last winter session of
Parliament following the Prime Minister's statements that the Ram
temple issue was one of ``national sentiment'' was in fact a
``positive vote by Parliament for the Ram temple.''
All that was needed now was to hand over the land to the Ram
Janmabhoomi Nirman Samiti, generate enthusiasm among the people,
and launch the ``final phase of the Ram temple movement.''
These statements were made here today at the end of a two-day
meeting of the Nirman Samiti, where decisions taken by the
`dharam sansad' at the Kumbh mela earlier this year were
approved. A VHP meeting in Bhopal on June 25 and 26 will chalk
out the ground plan for implementing the decisions.
`Sants' and `sadhus' are to tour the country to create an
atmosphere congenial to the project - a `jap yagya' with
thousands of people chanting `Jai Ram' is to be organised from
November 26, and from January 21 to 27 next year, `sants' will
march from Ayodhya to Parliament to assert their demand. Anytime
``after March 12'', construction could begin.
However, Mr. Ashok Singhal, working president of the VHP,
rejected the suggestion that the proposed agitation was being
timed for the Uttar Pradesh elections which are also scheduled in
March. ``Elections come and go, we have our own programme,'' he
said.
Significantly, the president of the Samiti, Ram Chandra Param
Hans, who belongs to one of the religious `akharas' in Ayodhya,
did not attend the meeting. Also missing was another prominent
figure, Mahant Nritya Gopaldas. Although the VHP tried to explain
their absence on grounds of illness, it is known that the
`akharas' are extremely unhappy with the VHP. Most of them had
boycotted the VHP-led `dharam sansad' at the Kumbh mela, and more
recently, the `akharas' had jointly adopted a resolution to say
they would have nothing to do with any VHP programme related to
the Ram temple or to keeping the Ganges pure.
Mr. Singhal had unsuccessfully tried to gather the saffron force
of `sadhus' together on the Tehri Dam issue claiming that the
``special purificatory'' of the Ganges water would be affected by
the dam as the Bhagirathi river water would be diverted to the
artificial reservoir. But that issue has flopped.
Swami Chinmayanand today said that MPs should appeal to the
Government to ask it to appeal to the courts to give an early
verdict on the Ayodhya-related cases. At the same time, he said
that irrespective of what the courts do, the VHP would go ahead
with its Ram temple plans. He insisted that the Lok Sabha had
already ``approved'' of these through the vote in Parliament
during the last winter session.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Musharraf decision prompted by domestic factors Next : Quake in Guwahati | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|