|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, June 07, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
Thank God, neither umpire was an Asian!
By Rizwan Ehsan Ali
ISLAMABAD JUNE 6. Thank God, the umpires at Old Trafford were not
from India or Sri Lanka. Otherwise once again Asia would have
come under fire after Pakistan beat England by a massive 108 runs
in a dramatic post-tea session to level the two-Test series 1-1
at Manchester.
Why is the British media blaming one of the seasoned umpires in
Test cricket David Shepherd - and his West Indian colleague Eddie
Nichols? Was it not the case of error of judgement as four
English batsmen were given out to what appeared to be no-balls?
Had Darren Gough and Dominic Cork defied Pakistan bowlers, surely
the British media would have ignored all the four no-balls, just
like they did in the first innings when Pakistan's Yousuf Youhana
and Younis Khan were given out after TV technology clearly showed
that both batsmen should not have been.
But that's not something new from the British writers. There is
always hue and cry when the English team loses and they give
little credit to their opponents and look for excuses to justify
England's defeats.
Remember, they didn't bother to blame West Indian umpire Steve
Bucknor last year when Pakistan lost the Test at Karachi in near
darkness. Instead they applauded the decision because England was
winning when it was difficult for the Pakistan fielders to spot
the ball in virtual darkness.
'Human error' disappears
Now a famous phrase `human error' has disappeared and instead
everybody is calling for use of technology. We should accept that
umpires were under tremendous pressure at Old Trafford. True,
they should first notice whether the bowler is delivering a
legitimate ball before shifting their concentration to the
striker's end, but why we are not admitting that, in pressure
situations such unintentional errors do occur.
Now there will be outrage all over the world after an Asian
team's victory against a white team. Suggestions would come from
all parts of the cricketing world that umpires in the middle
should use the technology before giving the ruling.
But what will happen to those decisions in which umpires give the
benefit of doubt to a batsman and the game continues. A classic
example in this case is of Marcus Trescothick when Shepherd
confidently said not out after TV replays clearly suggested that
Saqlain's legitimate delivery had brushed the left-hander's
gloves before Youhana took a splendid low catch at silly point.
The beauty of the gentlemen's game will be lost if technology
supersedes the two men in white coat and black trousers. Will it
not undermine the authority of the two men in the centre if they
start consulting the TV crew? They are bound to commit mistakes
under pressure. Sometimes it will please the Britons and in some
cases they have to accept it was a human error and nothing else.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Debacle for Thipsay, Aarthie ambushes Pallavi Next : England is the underdog | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|