|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, June 01, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Exchanges over Jayalalitha remark
By Our Special Correspondent
CHENNAI, MAY 31. The Chief Minister, Ms. Jayalalitha, today
sparked a furore in the Tamil Nadu Assembly, describing the
former Chief Minister, Mr. M. Karunanidhi, as an ``evil force''.
The DMK members, who rose in loud protest, found a matching
response from the treasury benches forcing both the Chief
Minister and the leader of the opposition, Mr. K. Anbazhagan, to
advise restraint on the part of partymen.
With the Speaker, Mr. K. Kalimuthu, refusing to expunge the
remark made by Ms. Jayalalitha, the House was drowned in noisy
exchanges.
The stage for the dramatic scenes was set by the MGR- ADMK
member, Mr. Austin, who said the AIADMK-led front's victory in
the election was made possible by the alliance arithmetic as all
the partners had their own votebanks.
This provoked Ms. Jayalalitha to say Mr. Austin, who was a member
of a party which invoked the name of MGR, had no right to talk of
the AIADMK's votebank, as he had allied with Mr. Karunanidhi whom
MGR himself had described as an ``evil force''. Mr. Austin and
his party owed their identity to MGR, but, by allying with the
DMK, they had betrayed the AIADMK founded by him, she said.
Actually, MGR formed the AIADMK to oppose the DMK, but Mr. Austin
entered the House by winning the election with the DMK votebank.
MGR himself had described Mr. Karunanidhi as an ``evil force'',
she pointed out.
As the DMK members were on their feet in protest, Mr. Anbazhagan
wanted the Chair to clarify whether it was proper to allow such
terms to go on record and whether the Opposition members too
would be allowed to make such remarks against ruling party
leaders. He wanted to know whether it would be in keeping with
the traditions of the House to have such remarks from both sides
to go on record.
Ms. Jayalalitha maintained that the remark was made, not by her,
but by MGR in the House. Agreeing with Ms. Jayalalitha, the
Speaker ruled that she had merely quoted MGR. Also, similar
remarks had been made by DMK members in the previous Assembly.
When Mr. Anbazhagan wanted to know whether the ruling party
members would tolerate similar remarks from the Opposition
members, Ms. Jayalalitha retorted that she had borne cruel,
scandalous and degrading comments from the DMK members.
Another DMK MLA, Mr. K. Ponmudi, wanted to know whether the Chair
would allow the Opposition members to recall the remarks against
Ms. Jayalalitha purportedly made by MGR.
Ms. Jayalalitha wanted the Chair to direct Mr. Austin to resume
his speech and reply to any of the remarks she had made, and not
allow the DMK members to continue with their interventions.
Mr. Austin, without touching on the ``evil force'' remark, went
on to defend his party against the charge that it betrayed MGR.
In this context, he recalled that he had worked to build up the
AIADMK in Kanyakumari district. Ms. Jayalalitha replied that she
had given him a Rajya Sabha seat only because he had worked for
the party, but he was not grateful and left the party after it
had suffered a defeat in 1996. The MGR-ADMK member then pointed
out that he had remained in the AIADMK till the Pudukottai by-
election in 1997 and that he was forced out of the party.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Govt. staff call off strike Next : Speaker allows videography | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|