|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, May 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
TDP leaders resent lack of consensus in Cong.
By Our Special Correspondent
HYDERABAD, MAY 26
The Mines and Geology Minister, Ms A. Uma Madhava Reddy, and two
Telugu Desam MPs, Mr G. Sukhender Reddy and Mr S.
Venugopalachary, representing Nalgonda and Adilabad, have come
down heavily on the Congress-I party for having two opinions on a
single issue like Pulichintala, while being a national party, and
called the Telangana Rashtra Samiti of Mr K. Chandrasekhara Rao a
pack of "dissidents" coming together from different political
parties.
At a press conference here on Saturday, they found fault with the
Congress "waxing eloquent" on Telangana development after doing
pretty little while in power during 1989-1994. It was NTR who
first took the initiative for different projects meant for this
backward region, they said, referring to the foundation-stone
laid by him for Srisailam Left Bank Canal, now named after
Madhava Reddy, and the spending of Rs 60 crores by his Government
while it was only Rs 9 crores during the 1999-94 Congress period.
Compared to this, the present Government headed by Mr N.
Chandrababu Naidu, allocated Rs 410 crores so far against which
payments were made to a record extent of Rs 345 crores.
Mrs Uma Madhava Reddy and Mr Sukhender Reddy condemned the way
the four Congress MLA belonging to Naglonda district, behaved the
other day at Pulichinatla project site, tearing off records and
throwing material into the river. "Only rowdies would have done
like that to get their things done". They said, the Congress,
being a national party, should have consensus on any issue. But,
in case of Pulichintala, one group within the party opposed it
while another demanded its immediate execution. The attitude of
the party in other States like Karnataka was also same where
there were divisions over local issues.
Instead of evolving a consensus on Pulichintala, the Congress
leadership was trying to whip up regional feelings which, in
fact, would impede the regions's development, they regretted. In
this context, they recalled how several Congress leaders in the
past, including Dr Channa Reddy, had "backstabbed" the Telangana
people.
They justified Pulichintala on the ground that it would do
justice to Telangana by greatly relieving Nagarjunasagar of its
present stress in relation to its commitment to Krishna delta, by
saving flood waters in the reservoir contemplated. As a result,
the Madhava Rao Canal would get assured waters and not surplus
waters which would be undependable. "As a farmer", Mr Sukhender
Reddy contended that it would not be possible for farmers in the
Krishna delta to raise three crops in a year as alleged. He also
dubbed "wishful thinking" the statement issued by the four
Congress legislators and TRS that the project would submerge 356
villages and restricted the number to 12.
Mrs Uma Madhava Reddy and Mr Sukhender Reddy said the Madhava
Reddy Canal was completed to the extent of 93 per cent with Rs
500 crores spent so far, against its latest revised cost put at
Rs 1,250 crores. The 1,470-metre tunnel which would draw
Nagarjunasagar water for the canal, would be ready by July 31.
One of the four pumpsets, supplied and being installed by BHEL,
would be ready shortly to squeeze water at 600-cusecs capacity
into the cistern developed on the hills from where the canal
would flow by gravitation. By September, the project would be in
a position to release water for about 35,000 acres in Nalgonda
district as against its final target of 3 lakh acres.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Wakf Board election rules changed Next : DSC-2001 to be notified on May 31 | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|