|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, May 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
'Baseless charges'
Ms. Irene Gupta, Senior Producer, Line of Fire, UTV, writes:
I am writing in connection with the article entitled `Playing up
indiscretions' on Page 11 of TheHindu on Saturday, May 26th,
2001. Although the article does not say so it clearly refers to
the statements made by Mr. Tarun Vijay, the Editor of
Panchajanya, on Line of Fire a programme made by UTV for SAB TV.
I presume that the press release you refer to in the article is
the press release issued on behalf of SAB TV regarding the
comments made by Mr. Vijay in this programme.
Your article makes several tendentious and unsubstantiated
allegations. For instance, you claim that Mr. Vijay ``found
himself sufficiently wheedled into appearing on a panel
discussion''. The truth of the matter is that Mr. Vijay was
invited and twenty-four hours later accepted without demur. The
only clarification he asked for was the names of the other
panelists. There is therefore no question of him being ``wheedled
into appearing''.
Secondly your article refers dismissively to the subject of the
discussion as ``differences, if any, between the RSS and the
Vajpayee Government''. I must say I am surprised by the use of
the phrase `if any'. Your own daily coverage of the subject
virtually disproves you.
Then, thirdly, your article claims that the press release
``simply zeroes in on Mr. Vijay accusing the Finance Minister of
`arrogance of power'.'' Once again the truth of the matter is
that Mr. Vijay was the only person to do this and he did it on
two separate occasions. The comments made by the other panelists
were comparatively innocuous and not particularly worthy of
drawing attention to.
Fourthly, your article claims at its start that ``the electronic
media in India is finessing the art of cranking up a controversy
where none should exist''. Does this mean that it is not
controversial to accuse the Finance Minister of ``the arrogance
of power'' and of treating people such as the BMS and their
supporters in the RSS as if they were ``murkh'' (fools)? Perhaps
you might think it is normal for close allies of the Government,
such as Mr. Vijay, to accuse the Finance Minister and other
unnamed BJP ministers of arrogance but I think most other people
would regard it as unusual and very possibly worthy of reporting.
Finally and most dismayingly I notice that your article claims
that ``probably before Mr. Vijay was out of the studio, the press
release landed on news editors' desks inviting their attention''
to Mr. Vijay's remarks. I am afraid once again this is not just
untrue but wilfully so. The programme in which Mr. Vijay appeared
was recorded on Tuesday. The press release was sent out on behalf
of SAB TV on Friday. The reason it was sent out on Friday is
because the programme will be broadcast on Saturday and,
understandably, the channel wished to draw attention to the
programme on the morning of its telecast so that more people
would watch it. I cannot see why your paper should find that
difficult to understand. It is normal practice all over the
world.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Now, war of words Next : 'Set up Lok Adalats for labour disputes' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|