|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, May 26, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Next
The humanist in the administrator
By P. Venugopal
Justice Poondi Rajagopalan will be remembered long by members of
the subordinate judiciary for his unbounded humanism, care and
concern for the welfare of its members. He was a born
administrator with an extraordinary ability of locating talented
and hardworking judicial officers and he took all efforts to
encourage them. His birth centenary fell on April 29, 2001.
In May 1952, the committee for separation of the executive from
the judiciary, headed by Justice Rajagopalan and Sattiyanathan,
Chief Secretary of the composite State of Madras, was touring
southern districts.
I was then working as district munsif-cum-sub-divisional
magistrate, Srivilliputtur. Justice Rajagopalan, addressing the
judicial officers, said the ``simultaneous system'', whereby the
same judicial officer disposes of civil and criminal cases
allotting separate days for their disposal, was a complete
failure as both civil and criminal cases had run into heavy
arrears.
But I stood up and said, ``Your Lordship, the ``simultaneous
system'' was not a failure in Srivilliputtur where there were no
arrears. Justice Rajagopalan became red-faced and his stern look
frightened my district judge more than me. At the end of the
meeting, he told me that I should meet the judge and tender an
unconditional apology.
However, Justice Rajagopalan, belonging to the ICS cadre and
having imbibed the true British tradition of fairness and
impartiality, was impressed with the disposal of cases in
Srivilliputtur.
When the separation committee report was published, I found, to
my utter surprise, the remarks: ``The simultaneous system is no
doubt a failure except we find some bright patches in places like
Srivilliputtur''.
Later, the first Law Commission headed by the then Attorney-
General Stealwad and Justice Wanchoo visited Madras. I was
directed to appear before it and give evidence on problems
relating to judicial administration. I was the only person
selected at the level of sub-divisional magistrate to give
evidence before the commission.
I was informed that it was at the instance of Justice Rajagopalan
I was selected. When I met the judge at his home, I almost broke
down. He asked me to compose myself and, in an endearing tone,
said, ``I know you. I have been watching your progress with
interest. I will give a posting in Madras. Why don't you come
here''.
But to my surprise I was posted as district munsif, Kumbakonam. I
rushed to Madras and told the judge that I was practising in
Thanjavur and that I knew most of the lawyers in Kumbakonam.
Functioning at such a place would be an embarrassment to me.
The judge said, ``getting a good name in a place where your are
not known is quite easy and I want to see how you fare in a place
where your are known to many''. I had no option but to join as
district munsif, Kumbakonam. I did the job without any fall in
the qualitative or quantitative disposal of cases.
The city civil courts were inspected by Justice N. Somasundaram
and noting the chaotic condition that prevailed-suits and appeals
were not numbered and decrees not drafted in several cases-he
recommended the creation of a new post of assistant judge-cum-
registrar.
The matter was placed before Justice Rajagopalan and I was
appointed to that post. It was extremely difficult to make the
staff work to a time schedule and obey the instructions issued
for streamlining the administration. I met Justice Rajagopalan
and submitted a proposal for transferring a few ring leaders to
far off places in the southern districts.
It was accepted. The results were both immediate and effective.
The judicial administration in the city civil courts was
streamlined and delays in administration were eliminated.
When I was appointed assistant legal adviser in the Union Law
Ministry, the time had come to bid farewell to my mentor,
guardian angel and architect of my career. With fruits and a big
rose garland I went to meet the judge, who was unwell.
Hindu tradition prohibits garlanding of a person lying on bed.
Seeing my predicament, the judge in a soft voice asked me to
place the garland in the pooja room.
Fortytwo years have passed. Looking back, I often wonder whether
anyone will be a mentor and benefactor to a person who has
annoyed him at a gathering of judicial officers. Such was the
greatness of a man who had a big heart to forget and forgive.
(The writer is a former judge of the Madras High Court.)
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Next : From 'easy pieces' to 'the horse's mouth' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|