|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, May 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
Experts split hair on Shakespeare's portrait
TORONTO, MAY 23. Not ``to be or not to be'' but ``is it or isn't
it'': that is the question scholars are asking about a portrait
whose Canadian owner says it is a bona fide 400-year-old image of
William Shakespeare.
Since the image of a youthful-looking Shakespeare was splashed
across a Canadian newspaper, believers and skeptics alike have
been buzzing about the smiling man in the painting.
It could be the only existing portrait made of William
Shakespeare in his lifetime, but historians are divided on
whether the painting, stashed in a closet or hidden under a bed
for generations, is really the Bard of Avon.
``I'm more convinced by this one than I am by any others, but I
would still withhold final claim,'' said Mr. Morgan Holmes of
Toronto's Ryerson University.
The painting on an oak panel is supposedly that of a 39-year-old
Shakespeare made in 1603 by an unknown actor and painter called
John Sanders, an ancestor of the current owner.
The painting, reprinted on the cover of Canada's Globe and Mail
newspaper, shows a young-looking man with crinkly reddish brown
hair, green eyes and the beginnings of a red beard staring out
with a glimmer of a smile.
``I was caught by the eyes. There does seem to be something about
the eyes that seem to resemble the eyes in the two other known
representations,'' Mr. Holmes said.
In the top right-hand corner is the date 1603 and, on the back, a
linen label reading: ``Shakspere, born April 23 1564, died April
23 1616, aged 52, this likeness taken 1603, age at that time
39ys,'' according to the newspaper.
By that age, Shakespeare had written the plays `Taming of the
shrew', `A midsummer night's dream' and `Romeo and Juliet'.
Ms. Marie-Claude Corbeil of the Canadian Conservation Institute
in Ottawa, which conducted authenticity tests on the painting
over a six-year period, told Reuters there was no doubt the wood
panel and paint date from the right period.
``All the materials are consistent with the painting being made
in that time in England,'' said Ms. Corbeil. ``There's no
anachronism whatsoever.'' But there is still no proof that the
portrait, while it may be old, is that of the world's most famous
playwright.
There are only two likenesses of him believed to be authentic: a
bust at his tomb commissioned after his death in 1616 and a 1623
engraving by Martin Droeshout, believed to be taken from a lost
drawing.
Naysayers point to the curly hair - Shakespeare has straight hair
in the two recognized images - and say the subject looks too
young to be 39 years old. And one Canadian University professor
said the phrase ``likeness taken'' was not in use until the
second half of the 18th century, suggesting the label could have
been added much later.
Ms. Corbeil said tests done on the label, which can barely be
read by the naked eye, found it dated from somewhere between 1475
and 1640. No testing was done on the ink.
``We basically think the label could have been added any time
between 1603 to 1640, that's the evidence we have from the
radiocarbon dating,'' she said.
If the Canadian painting is real, the glamorous, lively man is
starkly unlike the famous image of an older, balding Shakespeare
with a serious expression and a starched ruff.
``It's a quite persuasive painting. It's a quite different
Shakespeare from what we're used to: it's a wiry redhead as
opposed to a tall, dignified man and there's nothing wrong with
that,'' said Mr. Stephen Orgel, Reynolds professor in humanities
at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California.
``The problem for me, just physiologically, is that the two
undoubted portraits are of a man with straight hair and this guy
has crinkly red hair. So my impulse would be to say `wrong
guy,''' Orgel said.
According to the newspaper, the painting and the story of its
origins, was handed down through the Sanders family, which moved
from Britain and settled in Montreal.
The unidentified owner, a retired Ontario engineer who has
apparently spent his savings trying to authenticate the painting
he inherited from his mother, told the newspaper the painter,
John Sanders, was a bit player who worked with Shakespeare in the
King's men acting troupe.
Theatre historians are now expected to leap into the fray in a
bid to track down a John Saunders who can be connected with
Shakespeare.
The owner, who has identified himself only to the Globe and Mail,
has said he wants to auction off the portrait and he can expect
auction houses to line up for a chance to view the painting.
Sotheby's is already eager to contact him.
- Reuters
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : A routine breakfast: Megawati | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|