|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, May 16, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
State Elections
| Previous
Economic factors also did DMK in
By Our Tamil Nadu Bureau
COIMBATORE, MAY 15. Alliance arithmetic and the `invisible wave'
that have swept the AIADMK to power apart, there are some basic
economic factors behind the overwhelming rejection of the DMK in
this industrial belt.
These include the unresolved crisis in the plantation sector,
particularly tea, the continuing recession in industry and the
inability of the Centre and State Governments to pull the textile
industry out of the abyss.
A feature of the verdict in Coimbatore district, over the years,
has been the complete reversal of the trend each time.
In 1991, the DMK was routed and it was the turn of the AIADMK to
face the wrath of the people in 1996.
It was a wash-out for the DMK this time, and it lost all 15 seats
in this district.
Analysts, however, believe that there is really ``no serious
erosion'' in the vote bank of either of the Dravidian parties. It
is the `add on' of the allies and the undecided voters which
makes for a sweep.
For instance, in 1991, the AIADMK-Congress combine, riding on the
sympathy wave generated by Rajiv assassination, garnered 11 lakh
votes in the district, winning all 15 seats.
The DMK was left with 5.5 lakh votes. In 1996, the DMK-TMC-CPI
front polled 11.5 lakh votes (59.6 per cent), thanks to the
`anti-corruption wave'.
The AIADMK, which remained with the Congress, secured just over
six lakh votes (32 per cent).
In last week's election, the AIADMK-led front polled about 10.5
lakh votes (53.6 per cent), pushing the DMK front to the 6.40
lakh level (32.2 per cent).
The MDMK, which went alone, managed 1.53 lakh votes (7.7 per
cent). So much for the electoral arithmetic.
But there are local and economic factors which also influenced
voting this time.
Coimbatore district is the most industrialised in the State.
About one-third of its 42-lakh population consists of industrial
workers.
Textiles are the major industry of the region, but it faces the
stiffest challenge of fighting a recession that has persisted for
almost three years.
Six major textile mills have closed down and 13 remain non-
functional. Many of the light engineering units have also downed
their shutters because of the recession.
The general perception among the workforce is that the economic
and industrial policies of the Centre and the `indifference' on
the part of the DMK regime to their plight are responsible for
the present downturn.
They are convinced that liberalised imports, removal of
quantitative restrictions (QRs) and the new WTO regime of free
trade would have serious repercussions on the small scale sector
too.
Small spinners are upset that the Government refused to rescind
its order withdrawing excise duty exemption and some other
concessions.
While millowners are sore that the DMK Government did nothing to
redress their grievances and help them survive, the workers blame
the previous regime for not renewing the wage accord through a
new agreement.
They want the new government to initiate tripartite talks.
In the neighbouring Nilgiris, it is the plantation sector or more
specifically the tea industry which has been badly hit.
Though the BJP candidate in Udhagamandalam, Mr. J. Hutchi Gowder,
had all the right credentials, he lost to the Congress nominee,
Mr. H. M. Raju.
The result, it seems, is mainly an expression of the ``anger'' of
the estate management and the workers against both the Centre and
State Government which ``turned a deaf ear'' to their cries for
help.
The agitation by the small growers and the police ``mishandling''
of the protest last year are still green in their memory.
Even in the Coonoor (Res) constituency, considered a DMK fort,
its influential candidate, Mr. E. M. Mahaliappan, was trounced by
an ``outsider'', Mr. K. Kandasamy of the TMC.
The grouse in the `tea belt' is that both Mr. M. Karunanidhi, and
the Union Commerce Minister, Mr. Murasoli Maran, failed to come
to the rescue of this sector.
There is also a political angle to the `tea factor'. The DMK's
alliance with the Puthiya Tamizhagam (PT) led by Dr. K.
Krishnasamy jolted the plantations, especially estate owners.
After what happened on the Singampatti estates, they were afraid
that the DMK, if voted back to power, could succumb to PT
pressures.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : State Elections Previous : MDMK a 'wrecker', not quite | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|