|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, May 16, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Low turnout, sympathy factor handicaps
By M. R. Venkatesh
CHENNAI, MAY 15. The DMK today began taking stock of its poll
debacle with party seniors, former ministers and candidates
reporting to the president, Mr. M. Karunanidhi, the underlying
dynamics that led to this situation. A mosaic of factors has been
responsible for the defeat.
The leadership has been taken aback at the outcome as it expected
that the party would get a ``sufficient majority'' to form the
Government. Party sources said a late shift of about three to
four per cent of the votes resulted in a drastic reversal of the
DMK's fortunes in terms of seats won.
In several ways it was a ``sentimental poll'' for the 77-year-old
veteran, Mr. Karunanidhi. Apart from making the declaration that
this was his ``last election'', he had personally staked so much
on his party's performance in the last five years, even to the
point of overlooking intra-party dissidence and problems.
Notwithstanding the impression that the DMK's alliance strategy
alienated the upper caste Thevar voters in the southern
districts, a senior functionary argued that the party had not
been expecting Thevar votes in any case. But in the other
regions, OBCs' voted for the DMK and ``our tie-up with the Dalit
outfits has not affected this position,'' he claimed.
A low turnout, a `sympathy factor' in favour of Ms. Jayalalitha
after her nomination papers were rejected and a `vote for
change', besides local factors were among the more decisive
causes for the DMK's poor performance, the party sources pointed
out.
Another `major handicap', according to DMK seniors from the
western districts, was the largescale deletion of names of voters
from the electoral rolls. For instance, in the western belt,
where the DMK drew a blank except in Vellakoil, sizable chunks of
voters, who despite getting their elector's photo identity cards,
found to their shock that their names had been struck off.
In the north/north-western Vanniyar-dominated belt, the sources
conceded, the level of caste polarisation was very high this
time, with the AIADMK having an added advantage because of its
alliance with the PMK.
Further, in several Assembly segments, dissidents put up
independents to wreck the DMK's chances, the sources said. The
sacked Minister, Mr. V. Mullaivendan, ``made our lives extremely
miserable in the entire Dharmapuri district by sponsoring rebels
in disguise,'' confided a DMK candidate from that district. Again
in Madurai, the `Azhagiri factor' also played a role.
Mr. Karunanidhi, setting out the DMK's response in a statement
here today, said one thing was undoubtedly clear: ``Victory would
not have eluded us had our party workers worked still more
enthusiastically in campaigning and mobilising the voters.''
He said that while the total number of votes polled by the AIADMK
front was 1.40 crores, the DMK front got 1.08 crores and the MDMK
13 lakhs in all. ``From this it is quite evident that voters and
the people of Tamil Nadu have not disregarded us. The seats we
have got are less, but the hearts supporting us are more,''
argued Mr. Karunanidhi.
``Skilfully hiding'' the defeat of the Communist party in Kerala,
of the Congress in West Bengal and that of the PMK in
Pondicherry, the Congress and the communists were over-
celebrating their victory in Tamil Nadu, Mr. Karunanidhi said.
But ``our defeat is not that disheartening,'' he added.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Empty coffers a big challenge to new Govt. Next : Official probing wealth case puts in papers | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|