|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, May 09, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
Govt. red in the face over Hindujas-Mishra episode
By Harish Khare
NEW DELHI, MAY 8. The Vajpayee administration found itself
plainly embarrassed over the revelation that the Prime Minister,
Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee's Principal Secretary, Mr. Brajesh
Mishra, was accompanied by two of the controversial Hinduja
brothers when he called on the British Prime Minister, Mr. Tony
Blair, in June 1998. The embarrassment becomes decidedly acute in
view of the fact that the Hinduja brothers are among the accused
in the Bofors pay-off scandal and are currently involved in a
legal wrangle.
There was no attempt to deny the story. The BJP officially
refused to respond and suggested that comments, if any, would
have to come from the Ministry of External Affairs. On its part,
the Foreign Office spokesman said that ``the Hindujas offered to
facilitate some meetings and the offer was naturally accepted in
the national cause. It may be noted that chargesheets had not
been issued against the Hindujas at that time.'' He also
suggested that the kind of ``facilitation'' that the Hindujas
provided was happening ``on a regular basis''.
Even the Congress was surprisingly unaggressive in its comments.
The AICC spokesman, Mr. Jaipal Reddy, wanted to know the full
facts before commenting and demanded that the Government ``come
clean''. On the other hand, the CPI(M) called the Mishra-
Hindujas visit ``a serious breach of security and elementary
Government procedures''.
In a statement, the party's politburo asserted that ``the whole
sinister episode cannot be brushed aside. First, Mr. Brajesh
Mishra must be immediately removed from the posts of Principal
Secretary and National Security Adviser. This is absolutely
essential to restore public confidence.''
While Government sources concede that the entire episode brings
no credit, they offer a credible explanation why this faux pas
took place. The key, according to sources in the Prime Minister's
Office, is the context of May/June 1998. A new government had
defied conventional wisdom and staged Pokhran II, inviting
international condemnation. Having joined the nuclear club, the
Government felt constrained to mend its fences with an offended
international community, especially the P-5 nations.
There was no full-time Minister for External Affairs, and
obviously the Prime Minister, who was in charge of the foreign
affairs portfolio, could not do all the travelling. The burden
fell on Mr. Mishra to lobby key international leaders.
But, it was not all that easy for the new Government to access
key international players. The High Commission in London was
headed by Mr. Salman Haider, a distinguished diplomat but who
found himself out of sync with the foreign policy priorities of
the new Government. The new Government itself obviously did not
have sufficient confidence in him to help build bridges with the
Blair Government. That is when the Hindujas stepped in.
Having secured an appointment with Mr. Blair for Mr. Vajpayee's
Principal Secretary, the two Hinduja brothers sprang a surprise
and stayed on; and a sufficiently grateful Principal Secretary
found himself, according to the sources, unable to ask the
brothers to step outside. However, the sources insist, that the
brothers were not privy to the contents of the Prime Minister's
sealed letter for Mr. Blair; and, in any case, there was nothing
secret about the explanations that Mr. Mishra gave for India's
decision to stage Pokhran II as these arguments had already been
publicly made.
These explanations apart, the real interest remains focussed on
who could have leaked the story to the media in London. One
school of thought is inclined to think that the Hinduja brothers
themselves could have inspired the story. The brothers are
reported to be miffed that they have been grounded here despite a
``friendly'' Government in the saddle and perhaps the Mishra-
Blair story was meant as a reminder to the Vajpayee Government
that it was not living up to its part of the bargain.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : New Governors for Sikkim, Mizoram Next : Electing Jayalalitha as CM ethically improper: BJP | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|