|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, May 07, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Zoo authorities on the horns of a dilemma
By G. Mahadevan
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, MAY 6. A rapid increase of the captive deer
population in the Thiruvananthapuram zoo has placed authorities
on the horns of a dilemma.
Hesitant to face the perils that accompany sterilisation and
having no established protocol to release deer into the wild, zoo
authorities are at a loss to decide how to manage the cheethals
and sambhars that have filled the enclosures in the city zoo
almost to bursting.
Deer, by nature, are prolific breeders. A female deer has one to
two calves a year which in turn are ready to mate in another
year-and-a-half. The city zoo had 47 cheethals (spotted deer) and
42 sambhars in 1995. Now, there are 79 cheethals and 60 sambhars
in the zoo. That is, 50 deer have been added in five years. The
situation is similar at the Thrissur zoo where the spotted deer
alone number 120. In the Thrippunithura park, there are 93
cheethals and 18 sambhars.
All told, the captive deer population in Kerala now stands at
around 400. According to the figures available at the
Thiruvananthapuram zoo, the captive deer population in the whole
of the country is approximately 9,000. Of this about 6,500 are
cheethals and 2,500 are sambhars. This indicates that the problem
of over-population is prevalent in almost all the zoos in the
country.
In the city zoo--as in most of the zoos--it is uncontrolled
breeding that has led to this problem with deer numbers. The
question now confronting zoo authorities, here, is how to go
about controlling their deer population. The first method that
seems obvious--sterilisation--is, however, seen as a last resort
by the authorities. Deer being very excitable by nature are
extremely difficult to capture and tranquilise. Once they are
disturbed, the deer tend to rush helter skelter injuring
themselves, sometimes fatally, in the process.
Deer can also die due to fright or trauma suffered during the
capture and the subsequent sterilisation process. In fact it is
the death of a deer during the sterilisation process at the
Thrippunithura park and the subsequent public outcry that led to
the shelving of a plan to sterilise all the male deer in that
zoo. The half completed sterilisation process at Thrippunithura
has only spelt doom to the efforts at controlling the deer
population there. All this has made the zoo authorities in the
State very hesitant to take up sterilisation of the captive deer
population.
The lasting solution as advocated by zoo authorities and animal
rights groups is introduction of these deer to the wild. However,
this process too is fraught with dangers. Captive-bred deer that
have been subjected to `human imprinting' stand very little
chance of surviving in the wild. For instance, they do not even
know to graze for food. Due to a friendly human contact in the
zoos, these deer are more prone to be victims of hunting.
Captive-bred deer are also known to be carriers of such diseases
as tuberculosis which is non-existent among wild deer. Moreover,
in-breeding among captive deer has also considerably weakened
their gene-stock. Introducing such deer to the wild can have
disastrous consequences.
Zoo authorities and NGOs such as the People For Animals (PFA)
suggest the creation of special enclosures in identified wildlife
reserves where the captive-bred deer can be initially introduced
and observed for adaptability. If the deer take to the habitat,
they can then be released into the reserves where too they need
to be observed for adaptability. Zoo authorities say the Forest
Department must take up the responsibility for identifying
suitable reserves, creating the enclosures and the subsequent
monitoring of the deer.
According to the Director of Zoos, Mr. Yelakki, it would take
only about a year to put such a system in place. According to the
zoo authorities here, Kerala is perhaps the only State where the
zoos do not come under the control of the Forest Department.
Here, it is the Department of Culture that oversees the
management of the zoos.
The PFA activist, Ms. Leela Latheef, warns that if more deer
parks are set up in the State, the problem of the exploding deer
population would only become worse. Even though an augmentation
of the deer enclosures is envisaged in the masterplan of the
Thiruvananthapuram zoo, this is at best a stop-gap arrangement.
If something drastic is not done, right away, the deer in the
city zoo would soon have only standing space in their enclosures.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Remembering Tagore Next : 'Extremism encouraged in TN' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|