|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, May 04, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
U.N. panel yet to demarcate Ethiopia-Eritrea border
By M. S. Prabhakara
ADDIS ABABA, MAY 3. The recent establishment of a 25-km-wide
Temporary Security Zone (TSZ) along the border between Eritrea
and Ethiopia, according to Mr Legwaila Joseph Legwaila, Special
Representative of the U.N. Secretary General and Head of UNMEE,
is a ``penultimate step in the solution of the Ethiopia-Eritrea
conflict''.
Perhaps no recent war on this continent has been more fiercely
fought, and more difficult to comprehend, than the three-year
conflict, a war seemingly over disputes about the border between
the two countries. The belligerents, in particular the leadership
of the Tigray People's Liberation Front, the dominant party in
the ruling coalition in Ethiopia, going under the name of the
Ethiopian Peoples Revolutionary Democratic Front, and the Eritrea
People's Liberation Front, have been the closest of friends and
comrades in arms who fought long and hard to oust the Mengistu
regime. Further, the two parties co-operated with each other in
ensuring that an independent Eritrea would emerge following a
peaceful agreement. And yet, less than five years after Eritrea
became independent, it was engaged in a bitter conflict with its
erstwhile comrade. The costs so far: some 750,000 internally
displaced persons; and an estimated 65,000 killed in Eritrea
alone.
The agreement on the cessation of hostilities signed between the
two countries in Algiers on June 28 last year, marking the
beginning of the end to the bloody conflict that began in May
1998, provides for the establishment of a TSZ, ``a temporary
measure which in no way prejudges the final status of any
contested areas'', along with the deployment of a U.N. peace-
keeping mission and the creation of a military co-ordination
commission, in order to create a climate of confidence and
``conditions conducive to a comprehensive and lasting settlement
of the conflict''. The June 28, 2000 agreement on the cessation
of hostilities was followed by another comprehensive peace
agreement signed on December 12, which provides that the two
parties shall permanently terminate military hostilities. A most
notable feature of the current situation on the Eritrea-Ethiopia
border is that though the two sides remain deeply divided, the
ceasefire itself has held. This does contrast with the two other
(of the many) areas of conflict on the continent, Angola and the
Democratic Republic of the Congo, where the U.N. has been
involved as peace-keeper.
In a 50-minute-long conversation with this correspondent at the
UNMEE offices in the ECA complex here, Mr. Legwaila, sounded
positive and upbeat about he state of the peace process.
Describing the observance of the June 12, 2000 Agreement as
something that was doomed to succeed, Mr Legwaila said: ``The
peace process has held because even before the U.N. entered, the
parties themselves realised that the war was a terrible, tragic
mistake, and an embarrassment''.
With the creation of the TSZ, the U.N. mission had come to an end
of its most important task ``except that we cannot get out until
the border is demarcated''. Indeed, Mr. Legwaila expected the
mandate of UNMEE, currently expended up to September 15, to be
renewed. ``I can assure you that by September 15, the Border
Commission will be nowhere near completing its work. Our presence
here is linked with the work of the Border Commission (and) I
will not be surprised if we have up to two more extensions'', Mr
Legwaila said.
The next major task was the delimitation and demarcation of the
border between the two countries, disagreement over which led to
the war, by the International Boundary Commission, which will
function from the Hague. However, the two sides continue to
remain divided over the personnel of the Boundary Commission.
Another disagreement noted by the U.N. Secretary General in his
report to the Security Council relates to the larger scale
operational map of the border used by the UNMEE. Among the other
tasks that remain to be done are the exchange of prisoners of war
and civilian internees still held by both sides, clearance of
mines, and the return of the internally displaced persons to
their homes.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : China rules out strategic triangle with India, Russia Next : Global campaign against press curbs planned | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|