|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, May 01, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Previous
| Next
BJP stand on excise policy challenged
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, APRIL 30. Delhi's Finance Minister, Mr. Mahinder Singh
Saathi, today came down heavily on the BJP for indulging in
``doublespeak'' on the Excise Policy and challenged it to
announce that it was in favour of complete prohibition.
Talking to newsmen here, Mr. Saathi, who returned to work after a
week-long illness, charged the BJP and especially the Leader of
the Opposition, Prof. Jagdish Mukhi, with adopting a dubious
stand. ``I want to ask Prof. Mukhi and the BJP leaders what their
stand is on the liquor policy. Their own Government in Uttar
Pradesh has made liquor available in grocery stores, pan shops
and super markets. Their Government in Himachal Pradesh is
following a liberal excise policy and running the liquor trade
through private sector. But they are opposing the same in Delhi
just for petty politics,'' the Minister added.
Similarly, he said while the BJP-led Central Government had
removed all restrictions on import of liquor and wine and they
are freely available why did the Delhi BJP leadership and Prof.
Mukhi not oppose this policy. It is clear that they had nothing
to do with the welfare of the people and all the hue and cry was
raised just to score a political point. However, he made it clear
that under no circumstances he is going to succumb to pressure.
``We have not made liquor freely available. The only thing is
that the policy is being made more rational and progressive and
is aimed at plugging revenue leakages. But the protest by the BJP
was clearly motivated by other considerations,'' he added.
Stating that he was strongly against government involving in
liquor sale, Mr. Saathi said the agencies involved in this trade
had no business to be there and instead should concentrate on the
work for which they had been constituted. Why should the
government be selling liquor when the same job is done by the
private sector in Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Himachal
Pradesh and Jammu and Kashmir.
Referring to the now deferred Excise Policy, Mr. Saathi said a
number of changes seem to have been incorporated in the decisions
take by the Cabinet and this included the provision of NOC from
the MLAs. Mr. Saathi revealed that this proposal was part of the
note sent by the Commissioner, Excise but he had strongly opposed
removal of the NOC provision. It never came up before the Cabinet
and how it was later included is still to be found out. ``I am
looking into the matter and any decision in this regard would be
taken after taking a reasonable view of the entire matter,'' he
added.
He also revealed that the Cabinet had not agreed to the proposal
of home delivery of liquor which came up for discussion. ``There
were a number of decisions which were not agreed to by the
Cabinet and they had to be dropped keeping in mind the sentiments
of my colleagues. I am open to suggestions and will continue with
discussions with various sections before finalising the new
Excise Policy,'' he stated.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Previous : Steps to improve cleanliness suggested Next : Power theft by industrial units | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|