|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, April 20, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Drug firms withdraw suit against S. Africa
By M.S. Prabhakara
CAPE TOWN, APRIL 19. The case brought against the South African
Government by the Pharmaceuticals Manufacturers' Association, a
trade body comprising 39 multinational drug companies, has been
withdrawn.
The Pretoria High Court which is hearing this case was informed
of this by the lawyer for the drug companies, Mr. Fannie
Cilliers, when it assembled this morning.
The Court, which resumed the hearings in the case yesterday after
a six-week adjournment, adjourned once in the morning and again
in the afternoon, following a representation from the lawyer for
PMA that the Association was seeking a ``common ground for
settlement.''
There was also intense popular mobilisation before and during the
hearings on the issues involved by organisations engaged in a
campaign to secure cheap and effective drugs, if necessary, by
defying patent laws, for victims of HIV/AIDS.
The PMA took the Government to court challenging the
constitutionality of some of the provisions of the Medicines and
Related Substances Control Amendment Act, 1997, in particular
Section 15-C of the Act which allows for the import or
manufacture of generic formations of patented drugs marketed
under well-known trade names, and for the so-called parallel
importation of drugs.
The Act also provides for ``compulsory licensing''; that is, it
enables the Health Minister to issue a compulsory license to
enable a competitor to enter the market with a lower priced
version of the same drug before the expiry of an existing patent,
and without the permission of the present patent holder, on
grounds of pubic interest.
Details of the settlement, or deal if any, are yet to be made
public. However, according to a spokesperson for the PMA, the
Association had decided to withdraw its suit on the assurance
from the Government that it would abide by its ``obligations
under TRIPS.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Britain calls for restraint in West Asia Next : Tories woo ethnic minorities | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|