|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, March 29, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
Inside Egypt - III: Palestine embedded in the Egyptian mind
By Kesava Menon
KARNAK (UPPER EGYPT), MARCH 28. The Egyptian President, Mr. Hosni
Mubarak's frequent forays into peace-keeping between Israel and
the Palestinians can often bring knowing smiles to the faces of
the West Asian cognoscenti.
Although Mr. Mubarak has become a valuable intermediary between
the Israelis, Palestinians and Americans, his peace-keeping
efforts give the impression that he is mainly seeking a role for
Egypt that is beyond its potential. From this great centre of
ancient imperial Egypt, it is, however, possible to get a
different perspective on the significance of Palestine/Israel in
the Egyptian consciousness.
Even in its ruined splendour the magnificent temple at Karnak
resonates with the power of ancient Egypt, especially that of the
18th and 19th Pharaonic dynasties that took this civilisation to
its greatest glory. It is also ironically appropriate that this
glory was achieved as Egypt rebounded from the crushing defeat it
had suffered at the hands of a Semitic people, the Hyskos, who
originated from the same lands that today contain Israel and
Palestine. Around about 1700 BC, the Hyskos, deploying the arts
of chariot warfare against Egyptians who had neither horses nor
chariots, drove the then ruling dynasty of Pharaohs and their
court out of the Nile Valley proper.
After gathering their strength beyond the first cataract of the
Nile (where the Aswan dam stands today) the Pharaohs - Khamose,
Ahmose and Ahmose II - fought their way back using the tactics of
chariot warfare that they had mastered by then. The last of the
three above-named formed the 18th dynasty of which the first
couple of rulers continued the task of re- establishing Pharaonic
power in all of Egypt. Then, after a period of relative peace
under the woman Pharaoh Hatshepsut, Egypt threw up the greatest
general in its history.
Till about 1450 BC when his reign came to an end, the Pharaoh
Thutmosis III stormed forth 17 times and expanded the borders of
Egypt up to the northern borders of present day Syria. This
dynasty declined even as Egypt was caught up in religious strife
during the reigns of Akhenaten and Tutankhamen (whose claim to
historic greatness lies solely in the fact that his tomb was
discovered intact).
Egypt was not able to assert its authority over the Syrian
territories in the same manner during the nearly one-and-a-half
millennia after Tuthmosis III though the great Pharaohs of the
19th dynasty Seti and Ramses II did inflict numerous defeats on
the Hittites who vied for control of these territories. It was
only during the 12th century AD that Salahuddin Ayubi, a general
of the Fatimid Sultans who went on to form the Ayyubid dynasty,
reasserted Egyptian power over these territories. The last time
that Egypt fought off a challenger for control of these
territories was when the Mameluke Sultan Baibars stopped the
march of the Mongols. From this historic perspective it is
understandable that the Egyptians should look on the
Palestine/Israel territory with a sense of entitlement. This was
a part of their ancient imperium. Although control was lost to
the Ottomans and the British in more recent centuries modern
Egypt controlled the Gaza Strip till 1967. In the Egyptian
historical perspective, the Hebrew tribes that established a
kingdom in those territories in ancient times were either slaves
or wage labour who escaped from bondage in Pharaonic building
sites in the eastern Nile Delta.
The Arabs of the present day believe that people from all over
the world had no business coming into their territory and setting
up the state of Israel with a justification culled from their
Hebraic tradition. From the Egyptian perspective this Hebraic
tradition, even if accepted as factual, is still illegitimate
because its origins are subsequent to their own historical claim.
Today, of course, Egypt does not drum up its Pharaonic traditions
or three-millennia old claims to deny Israel legitimacy.
Nowadays, it is all about the right of their Arab Palestinian
brethren to establish a state of their own. But from the
sculptures cut into the walls of the great temples at Karnak and
other places, depicting Tuthmosis and Ramses slaughtering their
enemies and gaining vast territories, it is at least possible to
understand why Egypt thinks it must have a great voice in
Israeli-Palestinian affairs.
(Concluded)
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Appeal to Railways | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|