|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, March 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
More 'bevu', less 'bella' in Budget: Sindhia
By Our Special Correspondent
BANGALORE, MARCH 26. The Deputy Leader of the Opposition, in the
Legislative Assembly, Mr. D.V.Sadananda Gowda, said here today
that the Budget for 2001-2002 is "anti-farmer", and it had
neglected the agriculture sector.
He told presspersons that the Budget had exposed the serious
financial constraints of the State Government. Tax had been
increased on aluminium and kerosene stoves, and it would be a
heavy burden on the poor. The increase in the amount earmarked
for the Revolving Market Intervention Fund was not adequate, and
it would not solve the problems of the farmers.
He said the Budget had completely ignored education and the 10-
point economic programme that had been much publicised by the
Congress. The multi-point tax on electronics and the heavy duty
on cable TV operators were an unnecessary burden.
Mr. Gowda said the Budget had also ignored the Government sector
and given undue importance to the private sector. Like the
previous budget of the Congress government, this Budget was also
``full of announcements''.
The Leader of the JD(U) in the Assembly, Mr. P.G.R.Sindhia, said
the Budget was a ``disappointment'', and the Chief Minister, Mr.
Krishna, had again proved that he was not pro-farmer. There was
absolutely no relief to the farmers. He said it was a repetition
of the earlier Budget.
Mr. Sindhia said that while the attempt at introducing
administrative reforms such as abolishing posts in revenue
division-level offices was welcome, the much-publicised programme
to desilt tanks had not been given priority. Mr. Sindhia pointed
out that while it had been announced in the previous Budget that
25,000 tanks would be desilted under the programme, this time the
target fixed was to desilt only 5,000 tanks.
He said while he welcomed the setting up of the Legislators Area
Development Fund (LADF), the amount earmarked for each legislator
was a pittance. With Rs. 25 lakhs to each legislator, no
development work would be possible.
Mr. Sindhia said while the reduction in tax on coconut oil was
welcome, the move to increase power generation up to 250 MW at
Sivasamudram was not feasible.
He dubbed the Budget for 2001-2002 being as "Bella Bevu" but
quickly added that there was more of "bevu" and less of "bella."
The JD(U) State unit President, Mr. C.Byre Gowda, said the Budget
had betrayed farmers and no attempt had been made to tackle their
problems. The concessions shown to industries and to the ``liquor
barons'' only revealed the Government's priorities at the cost of
the farmers. He said it was a disappointing Budget.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Budget has belied people's expectations: Srinivasa Next : Kudos for effort to reduce fiscal deficit | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|