|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, March 08, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Left rules out 'third front' option
By M.R. Venkatesh
CHENNAI, MARCH 7. The CPI and CPI(M) are in no mood now to
consider a `third front' possibility for the coming Assembly
elections in Tamil Nadu as a fallout of the `Pondicherry pact'
between the AIADMK and PMK in the on-going seat-sharing talks.
Though the Pondicherry units of the CPI and CPI(M) have rejected
the ``unilateral decision'' of the AIADMK in inking an accord
with the PMK for the Union Territory, including having Chief
Ministers by rotation, the Left parties maintained that this did
not necessarily imply a `third front' option here.
``We stand by our original political line''-having seat
adjustments with the AIADMK and the other secular allies with a
view to defeating the DMK-BJP combine-said a senior CPI(M)
politburo member when contacted in New Delhi by The Hindu this
evening.
The member said the `third front' option was also not on the
agenda of the continuing CPI(M)'s State Secretariat meeting in
Chennai tomorrow, in which he will be participating, to be
followed by the State Committee meeting on March 9.
``We are discussing with the AIADMK on the number of seats'', he
said, even while making it plain that Ms. Jayalalitha's initial
offer was not ``satisfactory'' to the Left parties.
The CPI(M) senior also explained that the Left parties' main
grouse in Pondicherry was that the local units were not consulted
before the AIADMK reached an agreement with the PMK and hence the
method was hardly gratifying.
As of now, the `third front' option, following Congress-(I)'s
refusal to do anything with the PMK in Pondicherry and TMC
wanting to work together with the Congress(I) for the coming
polls, is not on the Left parties' radar screens. They will
continue to negotiate for an `amicable settlement' with the
AIADMK in the seat-sharing talks.
Even as both CPI and CPI(M) would insist on their minimum number
of seats expected from the AIADMK, the CPI's State Secretary, Mr.
R. Nallakannu, said Pondicherry was a separate State where the
political scenario was entirely different.
The CPI supported the Congress(I)-led Government there from
outside, being part of the secular front, he said. But the main
tussle in Pondicherry was between the Congress(I) and PMK vis-a-
vis the AIADMK's offer after the next polls.
The question of either linking or delinking Pondicherry issue
with developments in Tamil Nadu was not the Left's main concern,
he argued, adding, that it had not occasioned any consideration
of the `third front' option ``till now''. ``We are still part of
the AIADMK-led front'', added Mr. Nallakannu.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : 'Fishing activities being promoted in Mahe' Next : NDA wins new ally in Pondy | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|