|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, February 26, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Passport not linked to Hinduja's donation: Hammond
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, FEB. 25. The official inquiry into the Hindujas' passport
affair is reported to have concluded that there is no evidence to
link the grant of British citizenship to Mr. Srichand Hinduja in
1999, with his family's one million pound donation to the
Millennium Dome. It is also said to have found nothing unusual in
the speed with which his application was approved. But it has not
fully cleared Mr. Peter Mandelson, Cabinet Minister, who was
forced to resign for ``misleading'' the Government about a
telephone call he made to then Home Office Minister, Mr. Mike
O'Brien, on behalf of Mr. Hinduja.
Critics called it a whitewash job saying Sir Anthony Hammond, QC,
who conducted the inquiry, was a former Home Office employee and
in clearing it of any wrongdoing, he seemed to have been
influenced by his loyalty to his old department. It was dismissed
as an ``old boys' network'' operation whose credibility was
always in doubt.
The inquiry, whose findings found their way to the Sunday papers
today, upheld the charge against Mr. Mandelson that he gave
conflicting versions of his call to Mr. O'Brien - first saying he
did not speak to him personally and that the call was made by his
staff, and then under pressure admitting that he did have a
``fleeting two minute'' conversation with Mr. O'Brien only to
return to his original version that he never made the call.
Mr. Mandelson's contradictory statements have been at the heart
of the controversy leading to suggestions that he tried to
``lie'' about his role in pushing Mr. Hinduja's application in
return for the Hindujas' donation to the cash-strapped Dome, Mr.
Mandelson's baby at that time. The sequence of events appeared to
bear out the allegation.
Within months of the offer of donation in the spring of 1998, Mr.
Mandelson was on the phone to the Home Office inquiring about Mr.
Hinduja's application and six months after the donation was made
Mr. Hinduja applied for a passport and got it in a record short
time. This was his second attempt, having been turned down in
1990, and his ``desperation'' in becoming a British citizen was
said to be linked to fears that the Indian Government might seek
his extradition in connection with the Bofors kickbacks
investigations.
Sir Anthony Hammond's brief was to establish if the Home Office
bent rules to clear Mr. Hinduja's passport application following
Mr. Mandelson's intervention but even before the inquiry began,
the Prime Minister, Mr. Tony Blair, pre-empted it saying that on
the strength of papers he had seen there seemed to be no evidence
of wrongdoing. He said this while defending another Minister, Mr.
Keith Vaz, also said to have lobbied for Mr. Hinduja.
What the inquiry says about Mr. Vaz, under pressure to resign, is
not known. Thanks to the compulsions of domestic politics, the
focus of the inquiry shifted to Mr. Mandelson's conduct and his
bid to clear his name. The report criticises Mr. Blair's official
spokesman, Mr. Alistair Campbell, for acting ``too
precipitously'' in reacting to Mr. Mandeslon's ``confusing''
statements.
Mr. Mandelson has maintained he has been a victim of a
``kangaroo'' court comprising Mr. Campbell and the Cabinet
Secretary, Sir Richard Wilson, among others. His political
difficulties with his colleagues in the party and the Cabinet are
widely believed to be responsible for his downfall despite his
proximity to Mr. Blair. The report, likely to be submitted on
March 8, is said to be bad news for Mr. Mandelson who is trying
to stage a comeback. The Times said it would be a ``serious blow
to Mr. Mandelson's hopes of returning to frontline
politics.''
Meanwhile, observers said that notwithstanding the inquiry's
findings the fact of the Hindujas' vast networking stretching
right into the heart of the British political establishment would
not go away and the question would remain whether the British
Government ought to have given citizenship to Mr. Srichand and
Mr. Gopichand Hinduja (Mr. Gopichand got it in 1997) at a time
when they were under investigation in their own country in a
corruption case.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Bush envoy to tender apology to Japanese Next : Moon conqueror moots space tourism | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|