|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, February 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
It's all about commitment
INDIAN TENNIS owes a lot to Vijay Amritraj. His contribution as a
player may be matched in time, but his position as the sporting
ambassador of the nation - with the latest recognition coming in
the form of him being appointed as the messenger of peace by the
United Nations - is unquestionable.
Though he may not be involved actively round the year with Indian
tennis, Vijay has been doing his bit as a television commentator
in projecting a positive image of the country. The tennis academy
that he opened in Chennai about 15 years ago has played its part
in the growth of the game. He has been instrumental in India
getting the Challengers, the ATP Tour event and more recently the
World Doubles championship.
Vijay is ready to take the next step, and has been guiding his
son Prakash judiciously, to help the lad continue the family
business, the passion of playing tennis. Rather, playing tennis
with a passion. In spending more time with his son, who has been
trying his hand in the tournaments in India for the first time,
Vijay has been able to think more for Indian tennis.
The game is spreading to more places, the big events are
happening at home, but Indian tennis seems to have hit a
stagnation point, as far as finding players of the calibre of
Leander Paes and Mahesh Bhupathi is concerned.
As he relaxes at the CLTA Stadium, after a work-out with his son,
Vijay is able to appreciate the serenity of the place, the
quality of the tennis facility and the interest of the people who
have been trying to promote the game.
``It is a damn good effort to take the game to the smaller cities
like Chandigarh. You are much more relaxed in such places. In the
metros, it is the same everywhere, in New York, Paris and London.
Wimbledon is like a zoo. It is a magnificent zoo, but still it is
a zoo'', he says, as he takes one's breath away. It was he who
had brought the Challengers initially to the country. The threads
have been picked up, much to the delight of Vijay, who had aimed
things that way.
``It was done to develop the interest, so that our boys can get
more points. That is the goal. You have four wild cards in every
tournament, and the boys can get wild cards in the qualifying
event. I have always felt that it was very tough to go overseas
and get points'', says Vijay, even as he quickly addresses the
lack of matching effort from the players.
``It is one thing to get the horse to the water, quite another to
make him drink. I feel that it is only that much that the
promoters and others can do. Understandably there is always a
need for money. There is always a need for coaches, sponsorship
and so on. Still 150 per cent has to come from the individual.
There is an element of sacrifice that is unimaginable'', says
Vijay.
Sacrifice, hours and hours of toiling, team effort and all that
goes into the making of a player. But there is no guarantee, that
you are going to win two matches, after all that.
``That is the biggest problem we are facing. On the other hand,
the guys make two or three lakh rupees in the course of a
circuit. They think they would be better off keeping it. My point
is the top guys in India, outside of Leander and Mahesh, can take
half the money and re-invest it. It is like the stock and share
market. You put 10,000 dollars, and when the prices go up 100 per
cent, keep the 10,000 dollars and invest the other half back, to
be in the game'', he says with simplicity.
It has been quite an experience in recent times to see Leander
alone, and to some extent Mahesh, be able to make the best of the
tournaments at home, with the rest struggling to win two rounds
even at the 10,000 dollar level, with rare exceptions like
Prahlad Srinath and Syed Fazaluddin.
``You have to look at boys in the 16 to 20 age group. I think
Fazal is a good player. Prahlad is a very good player. I haven't
seen (Vishaal) Uppal play, but obviously he is in that group.
Mustafa Ghouse is a good potential, and so is Sunil Kumar. We
have got some big lads like Manoj Mahadevan. The AITA and the
rest of the State units and the promoters have provided the
springboard for all these players'', Vijay says, acknowledging
the presence of players with potential.
There have been a lot of academies around the country trying to
tune the players. The AITA itself has been supporting about 25
players in various academies, but still the results have not been
encouraging as yet. Are we in a hurry to get positive results?
``I don't think so. BAT is 16 years old. It has played its part.
The first two or three sets had a few good kids, who won the
Asian junior championship, etc. Leander came. We had a flow of
good kids. You are providing whatever the budget allows. The guy
is not paying for anything. But he should not feel that he has
made his mark and be happy. It is where the biggest individual
commitment comes in'', he says.
Stressing the fact that there is no magic wand or a formula that
can be bought from a store, Vijay highlights that things boil
down to the basics - the commitment of a 16 year old.
``The commitment means to be able to devote several hours in
training, off-court activities, not expecting anything, till the
guy is 19 or 20, because we mature late. We have to invest more
into one coach for four players at the most, on a long-term
basis. Then, we come to the education part. You can't tell the
parent that his son will only play and not go to school.
Foreigners have no problem, not going to school. That is the hard
part. We better do something quick, as we need kids for the next
generation'', says the former India captain.
At times it is perplexing as to how despite all their sincere
efforts, the players are not able to achieve the desired results,
and progress at a faster pace. The example of Mustafa Ghouse who
became the national grasscourt champion, but was able to extract
only a solitary game from Leander Paes in the Challenger first
round in Mumbai has been glaring.
``Well, losing love and one to the country's No.1 player is not a
bad thing. It is more a question of faith. You have to tell
yourself. `I am not good enough. Whatever I am doing is not
enough'. At the same time, we tend to create a high level of
expectations from our kids. If they don't live up to a certain
extent, we write them off. We are very good at that'', opines
Vijay, as he supports the players.
As a father, he gives the best support to his son, but does not
place the burden of expectations on him.
``My expectation levels of Prakash are zero. My original idea was
to make him good enough for college tennis. Thereafter, it is his
passion. We are ready to give whatever you need. And I can also
tell him what needs to be done. But that doesn't mean that if you
do that you are going to be the champion. Your passion, desire
and commitment should drive the tennis career. I leave it at
that'', says Vijay, as he emphasises the individual drive, the
hunger for success.``Prakash has passion, and that is why I am
with him. Otherwise, I will tell him, let us spend time together
as a family, and do other things as well. But he has shown that
he has strong commitment''.
Having played and watched top quality tennis from close quarters,
Amritraj is able to appreciate the qualities that make a
champion.``I am not inventing the wheel here. I am telling the
same story. Look at Roger Federer, Lleyton Hewitt, Marat Safin,
and the new Russian guy Michail Youzhny, who has come into
prominence now.
All these guys have absolutely no room for second best. Look at
Lleyton Hewitt playing a point. He plays that point like his
matchpoint. He is half the size of Sunil Kumar. He has no muscles
anywhere. But the guy won't go away. He is not able to take a
loss'', says Vijay.
If you cannot achieve that level of passion, then you have to hit
1000 forehands and 1000 backhands, get the legs stronger, work on
the upper body, mental toughness, etc. For talent, is relative.
``Lendl was not that talented in my opinion. But his work-ethics
put him right on top. McEnroe was quite opposite. He was the
genius on the court. What took him 45 minutes, took eight hours
for Lendl. But both became No.1'', he says, showing the different
routes to the top.When he grew up, Amritraj had a strong
commitment, and hated to lose. The hatred towards a loss was to
such an extent that he would be working on his game for
improvement the same day, after every defeat. He points out that
tennis has changed over the years, competition has become a lot
stronger, but asserts that the work-ethic does not change.
Even after achieving something of an ultimate acclaim, which he
told the CNN in New York was like reaching the Everest of his
career, and which he tells us, `in a scale of 1 to 10, it is 11',
Amritraj underlines the key factor in his career -``in the whole
of my life, I never expect. In which case you are never
disappointed. But do the work like there is no tomorrow''.
It is easier said than done. Yet, if the youngsters review their
commitment, there is no reason why India cannot get into the
World Group again in Davis Cup, have players in the top 100, and
juniors competing at the highest level. Even if they cannot pick
up anything from the likes of Vijay Amritraj and Leander Paes,
the juniors would have done their part, if they just pick up the
patriotic fervour, which fuels the fire towards achieving
excellence.
KAMESH SRINIVASAN
New Delhi
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Cool customer in the hottest seat Next : Pakistan & Malaysia in final | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|