|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, February 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
The vanishing breed
SPINNERS, THESE days, are in great demand even though in India
they might have been put in the category of `endangered species'.
If India cannot list a few international quality spinners, which
country can? They talk of flat pitches, awesome dominance of one-
day cricket, improved equipment as some of the reasons for
spinners languishing for quite some time now. The purity and
skills have diminished. The bowler luring the batsman, beating
him in flight, remains a dream. The traditional spinner, backed
by close-in agility to pouch the edges, seems history. Not many
would agree though. At least not four greats from the past.
One of them, Srinivas Venkatraghavan, former India skipper, off-
spinner of repute and now a respected international umpire, put
it in the right perspective when he said ``spin is an art in
itself and needs to be nurtured. It is not dead.''
But where and why has it vanished?
There have been some good and some disappointing bowlers in the
past two decades but few successes, with the exception of Anil
Kumble, an established match-winner. His injury and the
subsequent pull-out from the current series against Australia led
to panic, not to speak of dejection in the ranks of the team.
Just a reflection on the state of affairs. The tribe one could
have described as practitioners of spin has dwindled
considerably. The likes of Maninder Singh and Laxman
Sivaramakrishnan promised but failed to live up to it while
bowlers like Narendra Hirwani did not get adequate support. Even
as some did not get the time to establish themselves. Hirwani now
gets another opportunity to shape his career.
Spin was considered India's strong point before Kapil Dev, and
later Javagal Srinath, changed the approach. Yet, on home
pitches, the emphasis revolved around banking on spinners. On the
eve of the series against Australia, there has been some hectic
activity involving the selection of spinners for the conditioning
camp, a clear indication that guile, and not brute force, was
going to be India's line of attack. Skipper Sourav Ganguly spoke
openly of having spinner-friendly pitches to counter the
Australians. And why not, argued his supporters, of course with a
warning that even the Aussies had a couple of dangerous bowlers
in their ranks? But there is optimism in certain quarters in the
challenge being spearheaded by the young spin brigade of Rahul
Sanghvi, Harbhajan Singh, Sarandeep Singh, Murali
Kartik......with Sunil Joshi and Venkatapathy Raju not written
off and W. D. Balaji Rao and Sairaj Bahutule among the
contenders, despite losing out to Hirwani.
Spin may have remained their strength but the well-wishers have
been haunted by this compelling thought : Are the Indians still
good in this field? Does India have the talent, which is the most
essential ingredient to assess the bowlers available for
selection?
``Of course we have the right kind of talent but we need to guide
them'' maintained Bishan Singh Bedi, one of the acknowleged
greats and part of the famous quartet. The others who formed the
lethal Indian attack of the '60s and '70s being Erapalli
Prasanna, Bhagwat Chandrasekhar and Venkatraghavan - all
distinguished performers and all belonging to the top drawer -
too shared their observations with The Hindu.
``There are more pundits these days than cricketers,'' remarked
Chandrasekhar even as he defended the young bowlers of today. ``I
don't watch much cricket these days,'' confessed the wily leg-
spinner who ran through some of the most formidable batting line-
ups. ``It is becoming increasingly difficult for the young
bowlers because the expectations are too many and everyone seems
to want quick results. It takes time for any player to mature and
settle into a slot. So why this panic,'' asked Chandrasekhar.
The National selectors had packed the conditioning camp at
Chennai with spinners. There was such a tinge of desperation in
the summoning of Hirwani and Bahutule that at one point we had a
feeling even Rajesh Chauhan, more of an administrator in
Chattisgarh now, stood a good chance to earn a recall. All
because the Indian thinktank suddenly appeared to have
`discovered' that spin was the best weapon against the all-
conquering Aussies.
Bedi dismissed the suggestion that there was lack of standard.
``We have three left-arm spinners and two off-spinners competing
for places in the Test team. There are a few waiting in the wings
too. We need to understand what is our strength and then plan
accordingly,'' he pointed out.
Chandrasekhar agreed with his former mate. ``Let us not compare
because these days the demands are different. The bowlers have to
contend with one-day cricket too. I think we have some good
bowlers around and need to groom them.''
Prasanna too shared the opinion aired by Bedi and Chandrasekhar.
With the exception of left-arm spinners Joshi and Venkatapathy
Raju, the rest, as Prasanna observed, were young and in the
process of learning. ``Spinners take time to mature. Experience
is a must to excel as a spinner and that's why I say we should
back these young men. The approach overall may have changed but
the basics have remained the same.''
Elaborating on the change in the approach, Prasanna noted ``the
role of a spinner has not been defined in the case of these
youngsters. The accent is on medium-pace and the spinners, even
in our system, seem to be playing the supporting role. Spin used
to be our strength once but it has changed with times I guess.
The bowlers are apprehensive of attacking.''
Have the spinners become defensive? ``Certainly'' remarked
Prasanna and added ``the one-day game has inculcated this habit
of bowling a defensive line.''
Interestingly, Prasanna pointed out a major flaw in the spinners
of today. ``They are conceding too many runs even when trying to
be defensive. The philosophy of containing a batsman gets
defeated in this case.''
Venkatraghavan agreed. ``When I bowled, I expected the ball to be
played in a particular direction. I don't see that happening
today. A lot depends on the confidence level. We used to bowl a
lot in first-class cricket and bowl to top-class batsmen.
Essentially we used to be prepared for international cricket. We
were mentally well prepared to out-think the batsmen at any
level, which is what spin bowling is all about.''
What could be the solution then? What tactic would he have
adopted? Prasanna did not waste a moment ``I would have attacked,
even in one-day cricket. You can still attack by varying the line
and length. And then you have to turn the ball. Look at
Muralitharan. His strength is the turn that he imparts on the
ball. He succeeds because he is always trying to take wickets.
Our bowlers need to develop that habit.''
Bedi was candid ``our lads must learn to remember the basics. You
have to flight the ball and turn it too. You have to beat the
batsman in the air and off the pitch to get him out. Sadly, most
of our spinners are not following the basics. By bowling flat and
quick, they only end up conceding too many runs. This is an
important area which needs immediate attention. I would have
dared the batsmen to hit me. Unless you engage a batsman in
competition, the chances of getting him reduce.''
The steady decline in the standards was pretty obvious, one
suggested. And Venkatraghavan agreed. He was known as a bowler
who could perform on any track and that is why he wanted the
youngsters to remember ``spin is very hard work. It is mind over
matter. You have to excel in all conditions.''
The former India skipper did not agree that a spinner needed
support from the pitch. ``We did well even on pitches which
didn't respond at all. In my case I always followed the simple
lesson of a good line, length and direction. There can be no
substitute to this thinking. On a helpful pitch too it is not
easy to bowl well.''
Chandrasekhar had similar views. ``I never worried over the state
of the pitch. I was honestly never bothered what kind of surface
I was going to bowl on. If it suited me I would end up with six
for 23 or else it would be four for 83. What I am trying to say
is that you have to bowl well to get wickets. Whether the pitch
is good or bad, let it be remembered that it is going to be the
same for both the camps. This is my way of thinking.''
On planning the victims? Chandrasekhar admitted ``I never
planned. It was all chalked out in the middle. How to get the
batsman out depended on his form too in the middle. On his
batting that particular day for one to chalk out tactics. I never
looked at the pitch. I didn't give much thought to field setting
too. Maybe because I was different, fastish.'' And he insisted
each bowler had a distinct, individual flair and expected the
bowlers of today to develop on those lines. ``Have confidence in
yourself.''
The genial Chandrasekhar was very sympathetic of the bowlers
today. ``Please don't be harsh on them. It is easy to comment. We
are trying to find good bowlers and we must support this lot. Is
the great West Indian team not struggling? It is not able to get
one decent fast bowler. You have to accept certain facts in good
spirits. Of course, you have to identify the talented guys
because talent is the main thing. It is inborn. The finer points
can be learnt to help yourself but 90 per cent of your success
comes from your talent. It is same in any other field of life
too. The best of professors can't teach you if you are not
inclined towards studying.''
Venkatraghavan, pained at the quality of spinners in India, spent
time at the conditioning camp with the young bowlers and had
praise for the two Punjab off-spinners, Harbhajan and Sarandeep.
``They both have the potential and they must use their talent and
work hard. I told them about the importance of line, length and
direction and how to trap batsmen leg-before. I told them about
the significance of bowling with confidence. It comes from
bowling to good batsmen in domestic cricket before you bowl in
the bigger league.''
Prasanna echoed Venkatraghavan's views: ``we used to bowl to at
least 25 good batsmen in domestic cricket. Bowling to tough
batting sides in Ranji Trophy and Duleep Trophy was an education
to prepare us for international cricket. Exposure in domestic
cricket helps a lot provided you bowl to good batsmen. How many
times have our spinners bowled in a match to batsmen like
Tendulkar, Dravid and Ganguly.''
There was, however, one area which left Prasanna disturbed. ``I
am surprised that today's spinners don't know how to set a field
and bowl to it. They don't seem to have a clue about it.''
The spinners of the era goneby have had very valid points to
make. The spinners of today may nor may not agree. Here is what
Maninder, who learnt from the famous quartet and has been engaged
in passing on the wisdom to the current lot, has to say: ``the
decline in the standard is mainly because of the pitches. We need
to produce hard pitches to encourage spin bowling. The Board
should pay immediate attention to this area. We have immense
talent believe me and the boys have been working hard. Look at
Harbhajan and Sanghvi. They have worked very hard. I think we
need to guide the young spinners of today and I am sure we have
the right masters (past spinners) to do this job.''
No doubt about India having the masters to educate the pupils
wanting to learn the art of spin. Bedi is ever-willing, carrying
video tapes and books on the subject in the boot of his car, just
in case some youngster needs them urgently. Venkatraghavan has
never refused to share his knowledge. Chandrasekhar, laid low by
an injury, would be too happy if approached. And Prasanna, who
helped Sarandeep improve in a span of just five days at the
National Cricket Academy, has a ready offer. ``Talent has to be
nurtured. Give me ten young spinners and one year with them, I
promise I will give the Indian team three quality bowlers.''
Would the Board of Control for Cricket in India be interested in
starting a spin academy with these four stalwarts as the gurus?
We cannot find better men than them. To confirm, I asked Eknath
Solkar, the legendary forward short-leg fielder, a great source
of inspiration to the famous quartet. Solkar was emotional ``they
were great bowlers and there can't be any comparison. Not once
did I fear standing so close because I was so sure of their
abilities and had complete faith in their line and length. I
don't know about the current spinners but I would believe we have
the talent. But then there can never be any comparison''
VIJAY LOKAPALLY
New Delhi
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : 'Folded hands'- new logo for Indian team Next : The Test case that is `Wankhede' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|