|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, February 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Next
Joshi corners glory
By M. C. Raman
CHENNAI, FEB. 23: Devendra Joshi does only two things in
billiards. Either he loses or simply hijacks the matches. Or is
it cuejacking?
His cue flowed so marvellously in the final of the Khel.com
National men's championship at Wild West, Spencer Plaza, on
Friday it caused tremors that dislodged Ashok Shandilya of
Railways from the throne and made his master ascend majestically
to it for the first time in his 14-year career with a stunning
1653-972 victory.
No one in the hall asked why this Maharashtra man won the Arthur
Walker Trophy. But everyone was asking why he did not take the
coveted title even once for so long. Such was the class that
Joshi showed against the defending champion, who, the other day,
said: ``In this sport when you stand at the table you are the
player and you are your rival. There is no other opponent like in
other sports. Either you play well or sit and sulk in a corner.''
Shandilya did not sit and sulk in a corner. He came back with a
brilliant 189 break after the two-hour session in his 30th visit.
At the midway stage, Joshi already found his touch and took a
679-382 lead. The Railways player's massive break would have made
the final close. But Joshi, who let Shandilya off the hook by
nine points in last year's final at Bangalore, was in no mood to
repeat it again. He replied with a 144 which finally `killed'
Shandilya.
``That 144 was the killer,'' said Ashok after the match. That
neutralised the hectic effort that the defending champion made to
get back into the race. Perhaps his bad semi- final struggle
against Manoj Kothari prompted Joshi to tighten up the game.
Joshi could not afford to be casual. Look at the misfortune of
this man. He lost to Geet Sethi in the World professional final
in 1995 at Mumbai and thrice he made it to the National final,
but went down. He could even win the National snooker honours in
1998 at Calcutta, but the billiards trophy was elusive.
Without doubt it was a high class match. Break for break.
Challenge for challenge. But Joshi, after initial tentativeness,
simply took off to leave Shandilya to settle for the No. 2 slot.
Shandilya looked shaky in the beginning and was in two minds
about his strokes. However, he later said: ``The balls were
causing me problems. I was not getting it right.'' He had only a
65 in the whole first session. Whereas Joshi was already on the
move - 97, 91, 82, 105, 80 and 98, which he completed after the
break.
Joshi too had his problems in the first session. Every time when
the baulk line warning was coming he was fumbling and losing the
big breaks. But all that changed in the second half as his shots
flowed like Ganga. He was simply superb. When the baulk line
warning came twice in his 180, he showed his magic touch. He hit
the red which went in and the white took three frames before
coming back for the cannoning again where he wanted. In the next
call, his long white shot rebounded and hit both red and yellow
simultaneously and the spectators gave him a big hand. By now he
became the master of the table and Shandilya was fading away.
The 34 year-old Joshi, a Bharat Petroleum officer, made it at
last, showing excellent consistency. From the beginning he was
sounding the warning and those who heard it believed in him. But
the margin of victory was amazing at this level of competition.
He was unstoppable and Manoj Kothari paid a tribute to him for
putting up such a high class performance.
Manoj Kothari won the third place, beating Alok Kumar of Punjab
855-744.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Next : Rao's team in lead | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|