|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, February 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Next
An agenda for the economy
THE ECONOMIC SURVEY of 2000-01 predicts a difficult time for the
economy in the short-term but is optimistic that growth will
accelerate in the medium-term on the basis of a surge in private
investment that will take place if the many reforms it suggests
are carried out. The solutions it offers for the economy's
problems are not new. In recent weeks, much the same agenda has
been presented in the report of the Prime Minister's Economic
Advisory Council and earlier this week in the President's address
to Parliament.
The short-term scenario that has been painted in this annual
report is one of having to confront many challenges. A slow-down
in agriculture, the persistence of negative business
expectations, the uncertainty about the U.S. economy and the
fall-out of the Gujarat quake together make for what the Survey
describes in a very understated manner as ``some problems of
growth''. Somewhat ominously, the current fiscal year is
projected to end with a current account deficit that is 1.5 to
1.7 per cent of GDP, nearly double the gap in 1999-2000 and the
highest since 1995-96. This indicates that the continued buoyancy
in remittances and software exports has not been able to fully
neutralise the effect of high oil prices on the trade deficit. If
there was a great deal of (unwarranted) optimism on the eve of
2000-01, there is now a worry about how the economy will perform
in 2001-02. The implicit message in short is that if GDP growth
has declined moderately this year to 6 per cent, it could fall
even lower next year. While all this is far removed from the 9
per cent target that the Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari
Vajpayee, has laid down for the economy, in the Survey's opinion
an even higher growth path can be charted in the medium-term. The
steps that the report says have to be taken are many. Foremost
among them is a lowering of the fiscal deficit which even if not
exactly a radical prescription has been extremely difficult to
achieve. The key measure in this respect is privatisation (which
among other things is seen as a way to reduce the public debt)
where the 2000-01 Survey goes much further than previous
editions. With refreshing candour, the report also points to the
decline in the tax-GDP ratio during the course of a decade of
reform. But surprisingly there is a complacency about excise tax
collections, which is where an indefensible deterioration has
taken place in spite of a much-vaunted streamlining of procedures
and administration. To compensate for this it now seems certain
that the Government will soon expand the scope of taxation of the
service sector. Even as downsizing of government has become a
live issue on the reform agenda, an intriguing observation of the
Survey is that contrary to public perceptions the problem of
over-staffing is in the departmental public enterprises and not
in government administration. Indeed, the report goes as far as
to claim that downsizing government will not contribute much to
fiscal saving.
A number of areas have been identified for major deregulation.
Foremost among them are the retention price system in fertilizers
and controls in the coal and sugar sectors. To what extent policy
decisions on all these issues and more that have been listed - a
substantial relaxation of labour legislation, dereservation of
small-scale industry and a new bankruptcy law - will be announced
in the Union Budget for 2001-02 is an open question. The only
certainty must now be a reduction in the administered interest
rates on pension and provident funds which has been talked about
in many contexts in the recent weeks. After many years, the
Survey at last acknowledges (albeit indirectly) that the
Government's embarrassingly large food stocks should be put to
use in guaranteed unskilled manual employment programmes. It is
now up to the Government to find ways of putting close to 50
million tonnes of food to good use and not allow an accumulation
of the interest costs of carrying these large stocks.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Next : An elephantine challenge | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|