|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, February 13, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
Taliban wants to engage India
By C. Raja Mohan
ISLAMABAD, FEB. 12. With less than a handful of Taliban Embassies
around the world, there was no question of not visiting the most
important of these in a leafy enclave of the Pakistani capital.
There are tough but casual-looking men in pathan suits hanging
around to safeguard the mission.
We are ushered in politely after informing the sentry about the
appointment with the Taliban Ambassador, Mr. Abdul Salam Zaeef,
who had readily agreed to meet the two reporters from The Hindu,
despite the very short notice. It is a large house but furnished
austerely.
We wait for Mr. Zaeef in a small conference room. Some of the
maps on the wall are a bit outdated as they refer to the nation
as the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan. Mr. Zaeef represents
the new Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan that has been recognised
only by three countries - Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the United
Arab Emirates. Afghanistan, impoverished by a brutal civil war
for more than two decades, is now under international sanctions
imposed by the United Nations for supporting international
terrorism. But there is a mood of defiance here. Mr. Zaeef, the
unassuming Ambassador of the Taliban, has sharp piercing eyes. At
the end of a 40-minute conversation, his message to India is at
once conciliatory and hard. ``Afghans can only be bought by
friendship and not enmity,'' he warned. ``We can be very good
friends or very strong enemies,'' Mr. Zaeef suggested.
Speaking through an interpreter, he made explicit the strong
Taliban desire to engage India. Proposing ``normal relations''
with India and ``non-interference'' in each other's international
affairs, Mr. Zaeef said ``this is the basic right of one
neighbour over the other.''
Living in the same region, the envoy said, India and Afghanistan
must have ``diplomatic relations and commercial ties.'' Indian
delegations, Mr. Zaeef said, were welcome in Afghanistan ``to
find the realities for themselves.''
``Never in history we have done anything wrong against India,''
Mr. Zaeef went on; but he argued, ``it is ironic to know that
India is helping our opponents and running a propaganda campaign
against us.'' Now the hard part of the message comes through.
``Any support to the forces of opposition in the Islamic Emirate
of Afghanistan,'' the envoy said, ``amounts to interference in
the internal affairs of Afghanistan and prolongs the war... We do
not meddle in the affairs of other countries, and we want the
others to follow the same principle.
Questioned on the Taliban's backing to terrorist groups in
Kashmir, he denied there was any such support. While dismissing
what he called ``international propaganda against the Taliban,''
He argued that before this Government took charge, there were
terrorist camps in Afghanistan. But they had been shut down now,
he insisted.
Mr. Zaeef went on to explain the Taliban position on Kashmir.
``We do not want atrocities to be committed against Kashmiri
people.'' But would he condemn all violence, including by the
terrorist groups? ``We condemn any acts of violence by any party.
We want to see the Kashmir issue resolved through peaceful
dialogue.''
On the concerns about the Taliban's export of its extreme
ideology, Mr. Zaeef said there were two elements to the issue.
``If someone wants to follow the example of the Taliban, we
cannot stop them, but we do not want to export our ideology to
any other nation.''
Throughout the interaction, the Afghan envoy sought to dispel the
notion that the Taliban was acting as Pakistan's proxy. ``It is
clear from our history that we are an independent people. We only
follow the injunctions of Allah, our creator. We don't accept
bondage to any other nation,'' he declared.
As an example of Afghan independence, he pointed to the recent
refusal of Kabul to accept demands from Islamabad to hand over
terrorists wanted in Pakistan. ``If there is any one who
committed crime in Afghanistan, and there is evidence against
him, we will try him in Afghanistan or extradite him.''
Arguing that there must be evidence against the individual
accused of crime, Mr. Zaeef suggested that the rules were the
same - whether it was the United States' desire to get hold of
Osama bin Laden or Pakistan's request. Media reports here suggest
that the Pakistan Interior Minister, Mr. Moinuddin Haider had to
come back empty-handed after a meeting with Afghan authorities
last week.
Mr. Zaeef emphasised that Afghanistan had good relations with
Pakistan. But the relationship, he said, ``is never an obstacle
to have good relations with anyone else.'' He suggested that the
bad relations between India and Pakistan ``will not have an
impact on Indo-Afghan ties.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Plagiarism | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|