|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, February 11, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
CPI(M) unmoved by KC(J) sabre-rattling
By C. Gouridasan Nair
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, FEB. 10. The Kerala Congress(J) appears to
have miscalculated the effect its muscle-flexing would have on
the CPI(M). Instead of rushing to buy peace with the KC(J), the
CPI(M) has by and large chosen to ignore the threatening noises
emanating from the KC(J) camp. If one is to go by what senior
party leaders have to say, the CPI(M) would rather let events to
take their own course.
There has been no move so far to pacify the KC(J) leader and
Education Minister, Mr. P.J. Joseph. There is also no move to
advance the meeting of the LDF State committee, slated for
February 23, to ensure that the KC(J) working committee meeting
being held here on February 15 does not rush into any rash
decision.
It is not that the CPI(M) has a single track mind on the
question of sanctioning more self-financing engineering colleges.
The overwhelming view in the party is against any such move and
those who hold this view sincerely believe that it would only
accentuate commercialisation of education and creation of
educational facilities accessible to the wealthy few. But there
is the other view as well, though not in such noticeable scale.
But nobody in the CPI(M) wants to be held to ransom by any of the
constituents. The KC(J), many in the party feel, has done that
several times.
The LDF Government has added some 8,000 engineering seats during
the last five years. This is a record of sorts for any Government
in the State and a fair share of the credit for this should go to
Mr. Joseph. The CPI(M) may have been amenable to suggestions for
a far less number of engineering colleges, but whether a scaling
down of the numbers would solve the current problem would depend
on the kind of decision that the KC(J) working committee takes on
February 15.
The question that begs an answer is why the CPI(M) has chosen to
let the ball remain in the KC(J) court. The party does not think
that the KC(J) and the KC(M) can unite all that easily. The two
parties have a common support base and sharing it would not be as
easy as it is being made out. Mr. Joseph and the KC(M) leader,
Mr. K.M. Mani, too have been speaking in conflicting terms on how
unity could be achieved. Mr. Mani is on record that unity would
be conditional upon Mr. Joseph quitting the LDF, the latter has
not so far gone that far.
The Congress leadership also would have serious problems in
accepting Mr. Joseph in the UDF fold. The UDF has pegged its
campaign against the LDF Government on the alleged irregularities
in the sanctioning of Plus Two courses. If Mr. Joseph is welcomed
into the UDF, that major weapon in the UDF armoury would cease to
have any effect. Such a move would also bring additional pressure
on the UDF leadership at the time of seat-sharing.
How events would unfold in the days to come is anybody's guess,
primarily because it is all in the mind of Mr. Joseph. However,
he may not be able to keep the suspense for long as that would
hurt his credibility with the LDF cadres. He cannot tarry long
without a decision either way as that would hit his electoral
chances.
He may have little to worry if he succeeds in gaining entry into
the UDF. If that does not happen and the low-intensity war with
the LDF leadership goes on for long, it would harm his
credibility with the LDF cadres without whose wholehearted
support he would not be able to make it to the Assembly next time
round. In the recent local bodies election, the LDF was behind
the UDF by some 16,000 votes in the local bodies forming part of
his Thodupuzha constituency. The ruling Front had also lost out
in his home panchayat Purapuzha.
Although there is a campaign to the contrary, CPI leaders swear
that they do not intend to intercede on behalf of the KC(J). They
have taken the position that the CPI should intervene only if the
CPI(M) feels the need for some initiative to work out a
compromise. The CPI(M) State committee, which is meeting here on
February 13 and 14, may well take up the issue and some hint as
to where things are headed should be available after that.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Rs. 43 cr. more for rail doubling work Next : Final touches being given to EMS statue | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|