|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, January 28, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Acrimony still
The liberals are incensed with Mr. George Bush for choosing Mr.
John Ashcroft as Attorney-General despite all the talk of healing
wounds after a divisive election.
A REPUBLICAN President is expected to pick Cabinet nominees with
conservative credentials, but Mr. George W. Bush should still
have known better. Or did he knowingly choose Mr. John Ashcroft,
darling of the religious Right but a red rag to the liberals?
No one is picking on Mr. Ashcroft just because he does not smoke,
drink or dance. Rather he is being hauled over the coals for his
so-called extremist views that people say will make him less than
sutiable for the Attorney-General's job. Listening to people on
the Right will give the impression that Mr. Ashcroft is the best
thing that ever happened to America.
And the left-leaning liberals and the so-called mainstreamers
will make it appear as though Mr. Ashcroft is a hick and a red-
neck who will start passing guns to religious zealots and white
supremists to take aim at abortion clincs the first day he gets
into office. But the truth of the matter is that no will really
know what goes on ``inside'' Mr. Ashcroft's mind and the only
things to go by are his stated views on such issues as abortion,
gun control, and affirmative action. Even Mr. Ronnie White, whose
move to the Federal Bench was actively opposed by Mr. Ashcroft,
has taken the position that he will not label the former
Republican Senator a racist, but rather as someone who distorted
the African-American Judge's track-record.
The liberals are incensed with the Republican President for
choosing Mr. Ashcroft despite all the talk of ``healing'' the
wounds after a divisive election. The conservatives say the
political Left and others really have nothing to worry about Mr.
Ashcroft, whether it is on such issues as abortion or gun
control.
But going beyond the drama that was staged on Capitol Hill, the
question that has really come to the fore is why Mr. Bush settled
on Mr. Ashcroft for Attorney-General when he could have as well
gone after a few State Governors who were as qualified as the
former Governor of Missouri.
After being caught unawares over the nomination of Ms. Linda
Chavez for Labour Secretary, who subsequently withdrew suggesting
less than full support from the incoming administration, Mr. Bush
decided to hang tough on Mr. Ashcroft, sending the message that
as a conservative President he had the right to choose like-
minded people.
But there seems to be a message to the religious fundamentalists
of the GOP as well. Very early on in the political game in
Washington, Mr. Bush appears to be telling the right wingers and
those extremists sitting on the fringes that Mr. Ashcroft is all
they will be getting, from a personnel and from a policy point of
view.
- S.K.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : The battle begins at home Next : People power prevails | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|