|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, January 13, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Kerala cites quakes, elections for delaying reply
By Our Legal Correspondent
NEW DELHI, JAN. 12. The Supreme Court today granted six weeks
time to the Kerala Government to file its response to the report
of the expert committee set up to study the safety aspect of the
Mullaiperiyar dam and raising the water level in the
Mullaiperiyar reservoir.
A bench comprising the Chief Justice Dr. A.S. Anand and Mr.
Justice R.C. Lahoti, while granting time to Kerala, recorded the
statement of the Solicitor General, Mr. Harish Salve, that the
next meeting of the expert committee was scheduled to take place
on January 22.
During the last hearing on November 17, the court had directed
the Centre and Tamil Nadu and Kerala to file their responses to
the interim report of the expert committee set up by the Centre
on the directions of the Apex Court on petitions filed by the
Janata Party president, Dr. Subramanian Swamy and the Tamil Nadu
Government seeking the raising of the water level of the dam from
136 ft to 152 ft.
Today, the court was informed that while the Centre and Tamil
Nadu had filed their replies, Kerala had not. The senior counsel
for Kerala, Mr. Rajeev Dhawan, told the court that two
earthquakes had rocked Kerala, one in December last and another
this month. The State Government had to technically examine the
implications of these earthquakes on the safety of the dam.
Also, elections were due in Kerala in May and the Chief Minister
would not be able to take a view on this issue in the next three
or four months, he said and sought time to file the State's
response. The bench, while adjourning the case by six weeks, said
in the meantime Kerala should file its response.
In its response, Tamil Nadu said the expert committee had
recommended strengthening measures for the Baby dam and Kerala
should give permission to execute them in the interest of the
safety of the Mullaiperiyar dam. The Committee which also
considered the dissenting note of Kerala opined that the points
raised by Kerala ``are neither feasible nor well founded''.
The Tamil Nadu Government said that the Committee also went
through the stress calculation for Baby dam submitted by Kerala
and observed that ``the value for earthquake co-efficient assumed
is more than that recommended by the National Committee on
seismic design parameters on Periyar dam''.
The committee had stated that the water level in the reservoir
could be raised once the remedial measures suggested were
completed. The Tamil Nadu Government was of the view that all
these exercises would be futile if Kerala persisted with the
attitude of non-cooperation and attempted to delay the entire
proceedings one way or the other.
Tamil Nadu prayed for directions to the Centre and Kerala to
allow it to raise the storage upto 145 ft in the first stage and
allow the Tamil Nadu Government to complete the remaining
strengthening works of Baby dam.
Swamy's charge
Our Special Correspondent reports from Chennai:
The Janata Party president, Dr. Subramanian Swamy, condemned the
Tamil Nadu Government's decision to get the hearing in the case
adjourned by six weeks, that too when it had two months since the
last hearing.
In a statement, Dr. Swamy said ``it clearly confirms my charge
made earlier that the DMK Government, for some unholy reason, is
colluding with the Kerala Government on the issue.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Industrialist L.L. Narayan passes away Next : Magistrate can direct police to register FIR | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|